San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 2 | KANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% |
| 3 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 3 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
| 5 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 23% |
| 6 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 2% |
| 7 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
| 8 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 9 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 10 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 11 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 12 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 16 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 17 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | UPENDER West | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 19 | SONG Matthew | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | HE Bourne | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | ROSEN Benjamin | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.