Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 36% |
2 | JOSEPH Willem | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
3 | JUDD Mehta J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
3 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
5 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
6 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
7 | WANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
8 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
9 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
10 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
11 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% |
12 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
13 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
14 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
15 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
16 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
17 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
18 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
19 | PEGRAM Rafferty G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
20 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
21 | WHITEHEAD Amir | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
22 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
23 | LUM-DEBONO Alex | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
24 | GUO Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
24 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
26 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
27 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | 2% |
28 | SELL Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
29 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
30 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
31 | GAUTAM Vishnu | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
32 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
33 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
34 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
35 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
36 | POPESCU Tudor | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
37 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
38 | MAGIDSON Josh | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
39 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
40 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
41 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
42 | POPE Alexander | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
43 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
44 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
45 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
46 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
47 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
48 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
49 | LA BARR Edward T. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
50 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
51 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
52 | AMRANI David | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
53 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
54 | POIROT Max | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
55 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% |
56 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
57 | TOMASI John | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
58 | SZE Benjamin | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
59 | ZHANG Teddy | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
60 | SZE Timothy | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
62 | XIANG Siyuan | 100% | 4% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.