San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | COOPER Rowan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
2 | GARRETT Samuel | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | JAIN Sarthak | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
5 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
6 | PARK Elliot | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
7 | BHARGAV Siddharth | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
8 | AHMED Saheer | V D V V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
9 | DOWDELL Riley | V V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 6 | +3.4 |
10 | GUPTA Karan | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
11 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | V V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
12 | LEE Bryson | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
13 | ZHUANG William | V V D V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
14 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
15 | WILLIS Alan | D V V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
16 | WEAVER Neil | D D V D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
17 | HE Zhiheng | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
18 | KNUDSEN Travis | D V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
19 | ZHANG William | V V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
20 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | V D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
21 | WONG Nathan | D D V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
22 | BAGCHI Aritra | D V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
23 | ULINICH Alexander | D V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
24 | WATT Darren | V V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
25 | KHANNA Keshav | D V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
26 | ZHANG Andrew | D V D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
27 | PRAKASH Hari | D D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
28 | GREEN Jabreel | V D V D D D | V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
29 | WONG Kevin | D D V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
30 | ANDINO FRYDMAN Eli | D V D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
31 | RAJ Shrey | D D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
32 | LAI Aaron | D D D D V D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
33 | KUO Elvin | V D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
34 | LIN Kimball | D V D V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
35 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
36 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | V D D V V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
37 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
38 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | V V V D D D | D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
39 | SINHA Zaan | V D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
40 | ZHANG Nathan | V D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
41 | ANDERSON Kai | D V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
42 | ARUN Madhav | D V D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
43 | YUEN Nathan | V D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
44 | NG Biwon | D D V D D V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
44 | LIU Noah | D V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
46 | WANG Xu-Chen | D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
47 | BHARGAV Angad | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
48 | ZWICKER Jacob | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
49 | GU Aidan | D D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
50 | QUIROGA Kyle | D V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
51 | YU Austin | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
52 | JOSEPH Jeremy | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
53 | KUO Rylan | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
54 | ARMITAGE Liam | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
55 | RICHARDS Andrew | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.