San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | COOPER Rowan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 2 | GARRETT Samuel | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 3 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
| 3 | JAIN Sarthak | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 5 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 6 | PARK Elliot | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 7 | BHARGAV Siddharth | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% |
| 8 | AHMED Saheer | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
| 9 | DOWDELL Riley | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | < 1% |
| 10 | GUPTA Karan | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 11 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 12 | LEE Bryson | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 13 | ZHUANG William | 1% | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 14 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 15 | WILLIS Alan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 16 | WEAVER Neil | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 20% |
| 17 | HE Zhiheng | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | KNUDSEN Travis | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | ZHANG William | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 20 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | - | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | WONG Nathan | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 22 | BAGCHI Aritra | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | ULINICH Alexander | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 24 | WATT Darren | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 25 | KHANNA Keshav | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | ZHANG Andrew | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 27 | PRAKASH Hari | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | GREEN Jabreel | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 14% |
| 29 | WONG Kevin | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 30 | ANDINO FRYDMAN Eli | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | RAJ Shrey | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LAI Aaron | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KUO Elvin | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 34 | LIN Kimball | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 36 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 37 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 4% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 39 | SINHA Zaan | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | ZHANG Nathan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | ANDERSON Kai | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 42 | ARUN Madhav | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | YUEN Nathan | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | NG Biwon | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | LIU Noah | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | WANG Xu-Chen | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
| 47 | BHARGAV Angad | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 48 | ZWICKER Jacob | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | GU Aidan | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 50 | QUIROGA Kyle | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 51 | YU Austin | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | JOSEPH Jeremy | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | KUO Rylan | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ARMITAGE Liam | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | RICHARDS Andrew | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.