San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WYMAN Julian | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
| 2 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 3 | WOO Christian | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% | |
| 3 | SISINNI Riccardo | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 5 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
| 6 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 7 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 8 | LLIDO Soren | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 9 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 10 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 11 | LI Jett | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 12 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
| 13 | LEE Dylan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 47% | 17% |
| 15 | PARK Sky | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | CO Dylan | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 17 | MA Andrew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 18 | MA Bryant | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 48% | 13% | |
| 19 | SHEN Owen | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 20 | WANG Ethan | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | LING Eddie | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 22 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 23 | KIM Daniel Y. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 25 | TONKOVICH Ryan | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | RUBIN Max | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | RANJITH Yash M. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | MORROW Brenden | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
| 29 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 30 | LO Preston | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | CHENG Jonathan | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | CHEN Justin K. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 33 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 34 | WU Alber Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 3% |
| 35 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 36 | ZHENG zhe | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 37 | LI Matthew | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 38 | WU Lucas | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
| 39 | SEO Shawn | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 41 | YUE Jackson | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 42 | AGRAWAL Niki | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 43 | TULYAG Azim | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | LE Jacob | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 46 | MANIKTALA Suvir | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 1% |
| 47 | NGUYEN martin | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | DULAI Angad | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 49 | KANG Anthony | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% | |
| 50 | DINSAY Kristjan | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 51 | REICHEL Ezra | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | TUAN Evan | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 53 | LAM Nicolas | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 54 | ZENG Chuyi | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | YI William | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 56 | TSAY Jordan R. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 57 | MAK Osman K. | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 58 | PONS Diego | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | FANG Jaden | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 60 | PARK Ryan | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 62 | UHLIG Cole | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | CHAN Connor | 42% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | LYNCH Owen C. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 65 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 67 | SAH Steven | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 68 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 25% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 69 | EDISON Ansel | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 70 | KAREHT Kai | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | DERRICK Blake | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 72 | GORDON William L. | 21% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | PARK Rion | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 74 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | JEONG Taewoo | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 76 | CHOI Ethan | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 77 | NGAI Julian | 1% | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 77 | LI Richard | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 79 | BHOBE Arjun | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 79 | FOY Grant | 2% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 81 | ZHOU Ryan | 12% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | KROVIDI Arush | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 83 | PETROV Mikhail | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | PORTER Rory | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 85 | KARPMAN Benny | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 86 | METIN Atlas | 4% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 87 | CHUN Dashel | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 88 | ONG William | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | SHADDOCK Emmett | 10% | 48% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | KIM Jonah | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 91 | UPENDER West | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 92 | SISINNI Leonardo | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.