San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WYMAN Julian | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | CANLAS Nathan | V D V V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | WOO Christian | D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
3 | SISINNI Riccardo | V V V V V | V V V V D | 1.8 | 5 | +3.2 |
5 | KIM Ryan Y. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
7 | HOSKERI Anik S. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
8 | LLIDO Soren | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
9 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
11 | LI Jett | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
12 | COELHO Cristiano P. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
13 | LEE Dylan | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
14 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
15 | PARK Sky | V V D D V | V V V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
16 | CO Dylan | V V D V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
17 | MA Andrew | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
18 | MA Bryant | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
19 | SHEN Owen | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
20 | WANG Ethan | V D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
21 | LING Eddie | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
22 | NICOLETTI Luca | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
23 | KIM Daniel Y. | V V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
24 | ZHANG Jiening G. | D V V D V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
25 | TONKOVICH Ryan | D V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
25 | RUBIN Max | V D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
27 | RANJITH Yash M. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
28 | MORROW Brenden | D V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
29 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | D V V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
30 | LO Preston | D D D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
31 | CHENG Jonathan | D V D V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
32 | CHEN Justin K. | D V V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
33 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | V V V V D V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
34 | WU Alber Y. | V V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
35 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | D V V V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
36 | ZHENG zhe | D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
37 | LI Matthew | V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
38 | WU Lucas | V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
39 | SEO Shawn | V D V V D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
40 | FUKUDA Diego | V D V V V D | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
41 | YUE Jackson | V V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
42 | AGRAWAL Niki | V D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
43 | TULYAG Azim | V V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
44 | LE Jacob | V V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
45 | RASMUSSEN Sage | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
46 | MANIKTALA Suvir | V D D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
47 | NGUYEN martin | D V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
48 | DULAI Angad | V V D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
49 | KANG Anthony | V D D D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
50 | DINSAY Kristjan | D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
51 | REICHEL Ezra | D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
52 | TUAN Evan | D V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
53 | LAM Nicolas | D D V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
54 | ZENG Chuyi | V D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
55 | YI William | D V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
56 | TSAY Jordan R. | V D D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
57 | MAK Osman K. | D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
58 | PONS Diego | D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
59 | FANG Jaden | D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
60 | PARK Ryan | D D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
61 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | V D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
62 | UHLIG Cole | D D D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
63 | CHAN Connor | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
64 | LYNCH Owen C. | D D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
65 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | D V D D V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
66 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | V D V V D D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
67 | SAH Steven | D V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
68 | KALAMAS Nikolas | V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
69 | EDISON Ansel | D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
70 | KAREHT Kai | V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
71 | DERRICK Blake | V D D D V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
72 | GORDON William L. | V D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
73 | PARK Rion | D V V D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
74 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | D D D V D V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
75 | JEONG Taewoo | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
76 | CHOI Ethan | V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
77 | NGAI Julian | D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
77 | LI Richard | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
79 | BHOBE Arjun | D V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
79 | FOY Grant | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
81 | ZHOU Ryan | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
81 | KROVIDI Arush | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
83 | PETROV Mikhail | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
84 | PORTER Rory | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
85 | KARPMAN Benny | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
86 | METIN Atlas | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
87 | CHUN Dashel | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
88 | ONG William | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
89 | SHADDOCK Emmett | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
90 | KIM Jonah | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
91 | UPENDER West | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
92 | SISINNI Leonardo | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.