PTBA Basketball Association - La Puente, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 2 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
| 3 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
| 3 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 5 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 6% | |
| 6 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 7 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 8 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 4% | |
| 9 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 10 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 11 | JU Hanul | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 12 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 6% | |
| 13 | WANG owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
| 14 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 15 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 18 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 19 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 20 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% | |
| 21 | KIM Ian | 100% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 24 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
| 25 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | LEE Inwoo | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 27 | YU Austin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 28 | TIEN Jabin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 29 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 24% | 2% |
| 31 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | FERDOWSIAN Samuel A | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 34 | CHEN Josh | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | LI zerong | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LEE JiYuen | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | TANDOC Noah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 38 | NUGENT Jack | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 40 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 42 | LAU Christian | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | MAJAM Audie | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | KIM Teddy | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 45 | TUSANTOSO McKenzie | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 47 | KIM Remington | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 49 | NG Biwon | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LEE Damien | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.