Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
| 2 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 3 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
| 3 | HESSE Hans | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 5 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 6 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% | |
| 7 | GUAN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 8 | BARG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 9 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 10 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 11 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | |
| 12 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | LO Jake | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 15 | MUGA Aiden | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 17 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 18 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 19 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 20 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% | |
| 21 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 22 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 23 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 24 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% | |
| 25 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | |
| 26 | GOMEZ Chase S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HERNANDEZ Cole F. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 29 | RAO Neil | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 3% | |
| 31 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
| 33 | YU Austin | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 35 | MISHRA Milan B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 36 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | PARRA Sebastian | 100% | 72% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | AYALA Nayen L. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 41 | RUSSELL Michael | 100% | 88% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | GUO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 43 | GRAMMATIKOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 44 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 45 | MADDUX Bryce | 100% | 96% | 62% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | KOLLARS Jacob | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 50 | BECK Jacob | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BAXTER Max | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | LI zerong | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | WEN Ethan | 100% | 62% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | POTHIER Mark | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.