ESports Stadium (formerly Arlington Convention Ctr) - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUNDA Saketh | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 2 | MCALISTER Ian | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 3 | BARGE Jackson | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 3 | XIAO Andrew | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 5 | DEES Reed | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
| 6 | STETSON Jahaan | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 7 | ELLISON Harper F. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 8 | GONZALEZ Michael | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
| 9 | KASKAN Peter E. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 10 | COLE Cayden | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 11 | WEN Ethan | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 12 | SMITH Dylan | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
| 13 | YANG Zeph | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 4% | |
| 14 | MING Nathan | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% | |
| 15 | JONES Bennett | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 16 | BROWN Allan | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 17 | VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | XIONG Aaron | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 19 | RUNGE Patrick A. | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | WALTERS Page | - | - | 3% | 27% | 51% | 19% | |
| 21 | HESSE Hans | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 22 | SCHULTZ John | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 23 | POAGE Ian | 8% | 36% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | HAGER Spencer | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 25 | RAO Neil | 8% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | KERLEE Zachary | 27% | 48% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 27 | SMITH Ian | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | POTHIER Mark | 43% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | STARR Michael | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 30 | ELANGO SriVaaikuntesh | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | SALEH Omar | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | SINHA Zaan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
| 33 | MASK Austin | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | THURMAN Neo | 13% | 41% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | ERTEL Mark C. | 15% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | SUNIL Rishab | 6% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | GUERRA Gannon R. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.