ESports Stadium (formerly Arlington Convention Ctr) - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUNDA Saketh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 2 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 3 | BARGE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 3 | XIAO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 5 | DEES Reed | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% | |
| 6 | STETSON Jahaan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 7 | ELLISON Harper F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 8 | GONZALEZ Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 9 | KASKAN Peter E. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 10 | COLE Cayden | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 11 | WEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% | |
| 12 | SMITH Dylan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 23% | |
| 13 | YANG Zeph | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | MING Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% | |
| 15 | JONES Bennett | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 16 | BROWN Allan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 19 | RUNGE Patrick A. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | WALTERS Page | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | 19% | |
| 21 | HESSE Hans | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 22 | SCHULTZ John | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | POAGE Ian | 100% | 92% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | HAGER Spencer | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 25 | RAO Neil | 100% | 92% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | KERLEE Zachary | 100% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 27 | SMITH Ian | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | POTHIER Mark | 100% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | STARR Michael | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | ELANGO SriVaaikuntesh | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | SALEH Omar | 100% | 90% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 33 | MASK Austin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | THURMAN Neo | 100% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | ERTEL Mark C. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | SUNIL Rishab | 100% | 94% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | GUERRA Gannon R. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.