12th Annual Yellow Jacket Open

Mixed Épée

Saturday, February 26, 2022 at 9:30 AM

Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ALVIOR Joshua B. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 26%
2 ANDERSON Mathew T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
3 FULLERTON Houston T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 37%
3 KIM Derek D. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 36%
5 LEONE III Charles D. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 22%
6 OLIVERIUS Joseph W. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 49% 10%
7 KENYON Jacob 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 17%
8 DANZIG Jacob S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 64%
9 SHIN Andy (Sung-moon) (Andy) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 63%
10 JACKSON James 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 10%
11 LEE Kennith 100% 100% 93% 68% 26% 2%
12 BLAND Ian A. 100% 100% 99% 86% 41%
13 VALES Keyan 100% 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 8%
14 LIM Joshua 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 39% 9%
15 CHEN Gabriel 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 40% 9%
16 SCALES Chad 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 9% 1%
17 TIYA Biaya K. 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 37% 7%
18 JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 55%
19 MALLOY Patrick G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 42%
20 NGUYEN Audrey 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 11% 1%
21 ZHOU Alec Q. 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 12%
22 CRANE Matthew T. 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 9%
23 LIU Eric 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 4%
24 LANGE Eric A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 29%
25 NORMAN Christian 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 42% 9%
26 ARIAS Troy A. 100% 100% 97% 74% 22%
27 ALVIOR Jacob A. 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 33% 7%
28 WEISSMAN Kai 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 82%
29 LABROZZI Aidan 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 46% 9%
30 ELLINGTON Keegan A. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 12%
31 WANG Aidan 100% 96% 73% 33% 7% -
32 SCHARF Ryan 100% 99% 92% 63% 25% 5% -
33 CHAMBERS Matthew 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 11%
34 LEWIS Jared 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 26%
35 CHO Tyler H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 28%
36 ALLEY Everett 100% 99% 94% 72% 36% 9% 1%
37 ARUN Vikhyat 100% 95% 73% 38% 12% 2% -
38 CORLEY Avery 100% 100% 94% 68% 29% 5% -
39 EVANS Grant 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 30% 3%
40 ARMISTEAD Jack Riley 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 35% 3%
41 MODULLA Yathin 100% 96% 73% 32% 6% -
42 HAN David 100% 100% 99% 88% 58% 21% 3%
43 GUDAPATI Rahul 100% 100% 95% 75% 41% 12% 1%
44 DULISSE ALeX 100% 100% 97% 78% 40% 11% 1%
45 DIVERIS Joseph 100% 100% 98% 77% 36% 7% -
46 WANG Bryan 100% 100% 94% 73% 37% 10% 1%
47 SARIKONDA Akhil 100% 100% 90% 53% 16% 2% -
48 LENAHAN Conor J. 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 29% 4%
49 ZIMINSKY Karel M. 100% 99% 92% 65% 27% 5% -
50 NAIK Saininad 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 40% 5%
51 ZHANG Eric 100% 98% 84% 51% 18% 3% -
52 FONG Erik 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 31%
53 BASKIN Miles 100% 100% 100% 98% 77% 33% 4%
54 WEBB Jacob T. 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 30% 5%
55 RAY William 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 5% -
56 DECKER Carlton 100% 97% 81% 49% 19% 4% -
57 YANG Alan H. 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 16% 1%
58 WOLFE Alex 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 22% 4%
59 WOLF Christopher 100% 85% 46% 12% 1% - -
60 SU Rui 100% 99% 92% 69% 36% 11% 1%
61 TAM Ethan 100% 100% 91% 44% 10% 1% -
62 PATIL Amulya 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
63 SAYLOR David A. 100% 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 7%
64 APLIN Canyon 100% 100% 69% 28% 6% 1% -
65 SNYDER Ari 100% 100% 95% 70% 29% 4% -
67 PARK Judy 100% 98% 83% 52% 20% 4% -
68 MEYERS Jory B. 100% 100% 96% 76% 40% 11% 1%
69 FORSYTHE Hunter 100% 100% 94% 69% 31% 7% 1%
70 RUSCONI Jane 100% 99% 84% 27% 3% - -
70 AWAN Saqlain A. 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 9% -
70 LE Kevin 100% 99% 84% 46% 15% 2% -
73 THOMPSON Daniel M M. 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 29% 4%
74 WALKER Cory S. 100% 91% 58% 19% 2%
75 NG Joshua Z. 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 10%
76 TILAKA Michael 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 19% 3%
76 ENGLISH Marli 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 6% -
78 HAWKINS Sophia 100% 95% 71% 35% 10% 1% -
79 WEBSTER Davis G. 100% 100% 94% 72% 36% 10% 1%
80 PAK Joel 100% 96% 72% 30% 6% -
81 CHRONISTER Charles 100% 99% 88% 57% 22% 4% -
82 KERTESZ Stefan G. 100% 100% 93% 64% 23% 3% -
83 BETTS Jr Anthony P. 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
84 ATON Dave 100% 99% 93% 74% 40% 11% 1%
85 BERNSTEIN Matt B. 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 4% -
86 GEISSLER Maximilian 100% 70% 27% 5% - -
87 LIN Kason 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% - -
88 BIRT David (Dave) L. 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 32% 5%
88 GUNDUBOGULA Raj 100% 100% 98% 79% 35% 7% 1%
90 KRIEGER Jack 100% 75% 34% 9% 1% - -
90 SUNDQUIST Matthew 100% 93% 67% 28% 5% -
92 FREEMAN Zachary 100% 84% 32% 5% - - -
93 DEMAREE Adam 100% 99% 91% 61% 26% 6% -
94 MISKELL William 100% 100% 94% 60% 20% 3% -
95 FULLERTON Joshua D. 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 21% 4%
96 PIETILA Matthew 100% 84% 40% 10% 1% - -
97 VAUGHN David 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 10% 1%
98 HAN Ethan 100% 72% 25% 2% -
99 LIU Dylan Y. 100% 97% 77% 37% 8% -
100 BERKOWITZ Jeffrey 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 27% 5%
101 CHANG Shane 100% 95% 67% 27% 5% - -
102 ARNOLD Benjamin 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 20% 2%
103 SOTTILE Cole 100% 97% 77% 34% 5% - -
104 WILLIAMS Eli 100% 91% 63% 27% 7% 1% -
105 LEE Daehyeon 100% 86% 51% 17% 3% - -
106 LEVERETT-HALL Corrina 100% 76% 21% 2% - - -
107 KEMLE Brian 100% 95% 68% 31% 8% 1% -
108 BENITEZ Abner 100% 99% 89% 64% 31% 8% 1%
108 JUNG Elliot 100% 96% 77% 40% 11% 1% -
110 HALL Leandra M. 100% 80% 31% 6% - - -
111 JOHNSON Soren 100% 45% 9% 1% - - -
112 JACKSON Viktoria 100% 83% 42% 11% 1% - -
112 ROBINSON Blake 100% 92% 65% 31% 9% 1% -
112 CULLEN Reilly 100% 67% 23% 4% - - -
115 MIHILL Margaret 100% 83% 45% 14% 3% - -
116 HARTIG Larisa 100% 92% 61% 24% 5% 1% -
117 WILFORD Madigan 100% 65% 18% 2% - - -
118 ORTHOUS Lucas 100% 78% 29% 3% -
119 DILLARD Katlyn M. 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% -
120 SANDERS Charlotte 100% 94% 53% 15% 2% - -
120 MCCREARY Madeleine 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
122 ADIBZADEH Mehrdad 100% 97% 78% 41% 10% -
122 KOKA Ashwin 100% 54% 14% 2% - - -
122 LIU Kevin 100% 88% 43% 10% 1% - -
122 ECKARD Melody 100% 81% 42% 12% 2% - -
126 ALVARENGA Darby 100% 21% 2% - - - -
126 LIN Samantha 100% 84% 44% 12% 2% - -
128 LIU Nick 100% 49% 8% - - - -
128 RILEY Grace 100% 55% 13% 2% - - -
128 ILENRE Roni 100% 36% 4% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.