Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Men's SabreBirth Year 2013

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Gu, Andrew 2523 2266 58 A26
2 Isayenko, Daniel 2400 2136 34 E26
3 Koren, George 2268 2013 3 D26
4 Levy, Daniel 2259 2007 62 D26
5 HAHN, EVER 2185 1919 15 U
6 Lim Juwana, Maximilian 2160 1911 12 U
7 Zaletaev, Jacob 2149 1899 94 E26
8 Kaul, Ishaan 2143 1883 62 E26
9 Henderson, Louis 2105 1846 39 E26
10 Yu, Ian 2072 1817 12 D26
11 Shapiro, Leo 2037 1788 11 E26
12 CAO, HAOTIAN 2041 1783 11 D26
13 Bradbury, Ira 3489 1779 - U
14 Mogunov, Alan 2034 1742 15 U
15 Kim, Junseong 1996 1739 4 D26
16 Chen, Leo 2012 1731 12 U
17 Yuen, Caleb 1965 1716 62 E26
18 Lu, Hanwen 2323 1661 795 U
19 Lopez, Mateo 1953 1659 52 E26
20 Park, Sean 1914 1658 18 U
21 Thomas, Tre 1944 1645 150 E26
22 Ma, Cing Tim 2362 1634 - U
23 Li, Lucas 1910 1630 42 E26
24 Wang, David 1875 1618 8 E26
25 Lu, Simon 1869 1615 8 C26
26 Zhang, Weihang 1877 1608 6 E25
27 Hua, George 2048 1603 112 U
28 Schwartzman, Jakub 1889 1581 44 U
29 Zhang, Howard 1842 1575 12 U
30 Inskip, Charlie 2511 1565 - U
31 CIECIEREGA, MATTHEW 1817 1562 15 U
32 Stys, Owen 1836 1561 2 U
33 Kuang, Cyrus 1805 1538 21 E26
34 Fazelinia, Erfaan 1855 1531 18 U
35 Narayan, Rishi 1807 1530 16 U
36 Park, Layne 1763 1502 6 U
37 O'Keefe, Brody 1757 1502 13 E26
38 Moeller, Felix 1879 1498 - U
39 Lee, Jayden Junhyuk 1753 1482 12 E26
40 Su, Eric 1730 1474 53 U
41 Lee, Kyle Sung Ju 1750 1469 42 E26
42 Lee, Shane Gunn 1738 1467 13 U
43 Favo, Christopher 1741 1462 25 U
44 Chen, Aaron 1716 1461 112 E26
45 Hodes, James 2124 1442 - U
46 Risman, Edward 1735 1440 43 U
47 Zhang, Caleb 1689 1436 7 D26
48 Pi, Edwin 1727 1417 22 U
49 LU, RENFEI 2455 1410 - U
50 Wang, Harrison 1677 1407 126 U
51 Razai, Evan 1808 1384 124 U
52 Liu, Nico 1723 1382 11 U
53 Lloyd, Maxwell 1707 1377 53 U
54 Tai, Milton 1823 1374 7 U
55 Gucciardi, Francesco 1885 1370 - U
56 Chen, Brian 1638 1369 34 U
57 Hendershot, Henry 1779 1364 - E23
58 Deng, Richard 1649 1364 58 U
59 Suh, Ethan 1762 1347 6 U
60 Patel, Rohan 1696 1343 28 U
61 Choi, Brayden Yui Chit 1744 1340 19 U
62 Zhang, Eric 1979 1332 - U
63 Mishra, Ayan 1805 1328 335 E26
64 Trimble, Jonathan 2044 1299 - U
65 Ekambaram, Rithik 1570 1299 27 U
66 Chung, Leo 3198 1299 - U
67 Baby, Henry 1673 1296 16 U
68 Merzlyakov, VLadimir 1770 1278 - U
69 Maklin, David 1555 1266 41 E26
70 CHOI, LIAM 1554 1261 82 U
71 Feng, Ledi 2254 1254 - U
72 Kelly, Collin 1608 1248 9 U
73 Burch III, Andrew 1634 1246 33 U
74 Fan, Yuchen 1532 1235 59 U
75 Ko-Galloway, Keaton 1689 1233 61 U
76 DeGuzman, Miguel Javier 1676 1232 1 U
77 Kenyon, Kieran 2649 1226 - U
78 Martire, Francis 1568 1219 29 U
79 Li, Anton 1703 1214 81 U
80 Perkins, Jr, LeVar 1712 1209 - U
81 Stevens, Emeric 1651 1205 280 E26
82 Hsieh, Sebastian 1542 1201 236 U
83 Wollow, Bennett 1509 1198 8 U
84 Cao, Chong 1493 1193 21 U
85 Chen, Harrison 1482 1170 47 E26
86 Wang, Tiger 2601 1167 - U
87 To, Aiden 1502 1154 2 U
88 Tan, Daniel 1480 1153 27 U
89 Huang, Cameron 3000 1151 496 U
90 Norton, Hudson 1489 1139 23 U
91 Moody-Fuentes, Nelson 1437 1139 61 U
92 McLaurin, Jack 1919 1129 361 U
93 Burns, Carson 1419 1129 62 U
94 Jecha, Zachary 1479 1106 357 U
95 Liuzhang, Ben 1462 1103 13 U
96 Hu, Zheng 2806 1096 - U
97 Musa, Roman 1481 1085 18 U
98 Li, Jayden 1464 1082 - U
99 Kurbanov, Tamir 1537 1075 173 U
100 McCabe, Donovan 1487 1071 5 U
101 Basu Mallick, Sannibh 1513 1070 38 U
102 Kaplan, Richard 1683 1057 - U
103 李, 芃硕 2552 1055 - U
104 Taguinod, Aidan Matthew 1811 1054 181 U
105 Brown, Ronan 1708 1052 54 U
106 Parroco, Jacob 1471 1052 36 U
107 he, zhixuan 1455 1048 36 U
108 Hsieh, Maxwell 1313 1040 36 U
109 Li, Sky 1341 1029 6 E26
110 Ding, Orlando 1313 1018 22 U
111 Leaming, Sasha 1827 1015 1015 U
112 HUANG, KIMBALL 1333 1008 157 U

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.