Strength Ranking

Men's Sabre, Birth Year 2010

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate* Cons. Est.* 		180-day
Trend		 Rating
1 Huang, Alex 2683 2413 30 A24
2 Ng, Jonathan 2571 2307 80 B24
3 Tse, Aiden J 2455 2192 257 A24
4 Hwang, Jayden 2422 2159 5 B24
5 Kovalev, Daniil 2381 2110 27 B24
6 Andres, Michael 2364 2098 31 B24
7 Dittmer, Westin 3611 2088 - U
8 Carrington, William 2225 1969 1 C24
9 Oh, Aster 2194 1937 116 D24
10 Clark, Aram 2141 1887 24 E24
11 Dominique, Remson 2145 1886 37 C24
12 Yook, Isaac 2138 1882 92 B24
13 Li, Ayden 2125 1875 148 C24
14 Sun, Andrew 2111 1860 186 B24
15 Biviji, Ali 2099 1847 107 D24
16 Zhang, Kaixuan 2093 1834 166 E24
17 Kitson, Chase 2059 1801 72 C24
18 Nardini, Nathanael 2037 1783 46 E24
19 Ye, Ivan 2037 1772 6 C24
20 Pinto, Marcus 2009 1759 111 D24
21 Medvinsky, Daniel 2014 1757 3 U
22 Anand, Rishab 1994 1743 12 E24
23 Chan, Henry 1991 1741 20 D24
24 Gurevich, Benjamin 1995 1736 30 C24
25 Bollu, Viren 1987 1727 159 C24
26 Sassi, Ilyas 1949 1695 51 U
27 Huchwajda, Alex 2054 1695 148 E24
28 Ao, Christopher 1932 1683 63 D24
29 Sadhu, Neiyam 1933 1683 76 D24
30 DENG, HOI YIU VICTOR 2623 1679 1679 D24
31 Wong, David 1929 1677 407 D24
32 Novosyolok, Zachary 1920 1666 22 U
33 li, linze 1918 1663 38 D24
34 Tang, Alexander 2655 1652 - U
35 Valencia, Jose 1894 1641 43 C24
36 Saldarini, Glenn 1897 1638 85 E24
37 Lee, Brady 1881 1631 141 C24
38 Fadel, Alexander 1886 1631 1 U
39 Wong, Cody 2061 1625 - U
40 Burgess, Beckham 1885 1617 124 D24
41 Cricol, Damian 1894 1612 134 C24
42 McDonald, Finn 1856 1607 109 C24
43 ChenHe, YuHan 1858 1593 30 C23
44 Wong, Max 1850 1592 95 D24
45 Kovachev, Martin 1833 1583 107 U
46 Salman, Hamzah 1835 1583 59 D24
47 Liu, Aaron 1825 1577 92 U
48 Brock, Landon 1884 1574 - U
49 Rong, Jasper 1823 1568 72 C24
50 Wang, Tiger 1793 1542 25 D23
51 Li, Yidong 1790 1538 27 E24
52 Berkowitz, Gavin 1818 1537 94 E23
53 Iyer, Neil 1789 1537 78 D24
54 Ji, Johnson 1780 1528 269 D24
55 Zhao, Chen Fei 3145 1525 1525 U
56 Weibel, Rhys 2757 1502 1502 U

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.