The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

5th Annual Sword in the Stone RYC and RJCC

Cadet Men's Foil

Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MURUHIN Yaroslav 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
2 SIU Aiden 100% 100% 100% 99% 84% 36%
3 SADOVSKY Leor B. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 23%
3 VARGAS Bryan 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 14%
5 JAIN Aditya 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 46%
6 WOO Christian 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 42%
7 TSAY Jeremy M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 35%
8 GOBBO Alexander 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 21%
9 COELHO Cristiano P. 100% 100% 99% 91% 53%
10 SUNG Chang-Han S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 36%
11 KIM Derek A. 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 6%
12 DETERING Julian 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 18%
13 WYMAN Julian 100% 100% 100% 98% 79% 31%
14 MYERS Dean 100% 99% 80% 39% 9% 1%
15 RYOU Aiden 100% 100% 93% 68% 31% 6%
16 CHOI Ethan 100% 100% 97% 78% 38% 6%
17 AIKEN Nicholas A. 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 15% 1%
18 KIM Aiden 100% 99% 85% 47% 12% 1%
19 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. 100% 100% 94% 72% 34% 7%
20 RENTERIA Emiliano 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 14% 2%
21 MO Jason 100% 100% 97% 77% 41% 11% 1%
22 PIESNER Zachary C. 100% 100% 99% 95% 73% 34% 5%
22 LLIDO Soren 100% 99% 91% 68% 35% 10% 1%
24 LI Ryan Z. 100% 98% 84% 55% 23% 5% -
25 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden 100% 100% 96% 77% 37% 7%
26 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 50%
27 MORROW Brenden 100% 100% 94% 68% 27% 3%
28 WU Lucas 100% 96% 77% 44% 16% 3% -
29 OH Jaden 100% 99% 91% 63% 27% 6% -
30 WANG Ethan 100% 99% 91% 68% 34% 10% 1%
31 NICOLETTI Luca 100% 100% 97% 79% 41% 10% 1%
32 LE Jacob W. 100% 99% 83% 40% 6%
33 DINSAY Kristjan 100% 100% 96% 68% 21% 2%
34 NGUYEN Martin 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 17% 2%
35 HOSKERI Anik S. 100% 99% 87% 46% 8%
36 ANDERSON Jacob 100% 100% 96% 72% 33% 7% 1%
37 RASMUSSEN Sage 100% 95% 53% 13% 1%
38 ZHANG Aaron 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 11% 1%
38 YEE Johnathan 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 11% 1%
40 SMITH Grant D. 100% 97% 63% 22% 3% -
41 SISINNI Riccardo 100% 100% 94% 70% 30% 4%
42 BOUCHARD Kai 100% 95% 36% 5% - -
43 PARK Ryan 100% 85% 47% 14% 2% - -
44 FANG Jaden 100% 97% 75% 36% 10% 1% -
45 FUKUDA Diego 100% 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2%
46 ZHENG zhe 100% 99% 91% 63% 26% 5%
47 RYOU Andy 100% 100% 88% 41% 7% -
48 LI Jett 100% 95% 67% 28% 6% 1%
49 LEE Dylan 100% 98% 73% 31% 7% -
50 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 100% 43% 8% 1% - -
51 WU Alber Y. 100% 98% 86% 58% 26% 6% -
52 NGUYEN Liam 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 4% -
53 GREENEBAUM Oliver 100% 38% 7% 1% - - -
54 LU Ruofei 100% 37% 6% 1% - - -
55 HUANG Alston 100% 83% 43% 12% 2% - -
56 AGRAWAL Niki 100% 80% 31% 6% 1% - -
57 POUND Michael 100% 24% 2% - -
58 ALBINALI Eissa 100% 12% - - - -
59 BUTLER Owen 100% 91% 31% 5% - - -
60 DALVA Michael 100% 23% 2% - - -
60 PORTER Rory 100% 19% 1% - - -
62 HAHN Jacob 100% 50% 9% 1% - - -
62 YU Leo 100% 91% 63% 29% 8% 1% -
64 LIU William 100% 88% 53% 17% 3% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.