Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
2 | KIM Byung | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 29% |
3 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
3 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
5 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 35% |
6 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
7 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
8 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
9 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
10 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
11 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 6% | |
12 | PALIWODA Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
13 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 20% | |
14 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | 7% | |
15 | NATSVLISHVILI John Vano | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% | |
16 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
17 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 6% | |
18 | BAMBRA Taranjot | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
19 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
20 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
21 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
22 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 89% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
23 | WU Colin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
24 | LAI Boden | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
26 | CHOU Benson | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | |
27 | HEADRICK Jack | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
28 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
29 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
30 | LIU Adam | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
31 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
32 | CHOI Christian | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
33 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - | |
34 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
35 | TSANG William | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 9% | - | |
36 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
37 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
38 | KANG Brandon | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | - | - | |
39 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 69% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
40 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
41 | URBAN Leo | 100% | 94% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | |
42 | LI Ray | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | WASSERMAN Jacob | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.