City Beach Fremont - Fremont, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
2 | KIM Sullivan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
3 | ANDERSON Kai | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
3 | DONAHUE Lake | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
5 | PAK Elliot | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% |
6 | MARTIN Charles | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% |
7 | YU Austin | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
8 | WU Eric | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
9 | HOGE William P. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
10 | QUITORIANO Matthew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
11 | LIU Yueri | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
12 | SEO Shawn | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 35% | 4% |
13 | HSU Alexander | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 31% | 3% |
14 | SU Oliver | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
15 | TONG Samuel | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
16 | PARK Sangwook | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
17 | CHANG Andrew | - | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | < 1% |
18 | HE Zhiheng | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
19 | CHEN Bailey | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
20 | HIGGINS Calvin | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
21 | JAIN Samyak | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
22 | BAKKEN Archer | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | PRAKASH Hari | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 39% | 9% | |
24 | CLAES Lucas | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
25 | LAU Christian | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | ARMITAGE Liam | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
27 | CHOI Zachary | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
28 | LIANG Eric | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | |
29 | RYAN Pierce | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
30 | SIM Ian | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
31 | FU Adrian | 11% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
32 | NUGENT Jack | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
33 | RAHMAN Yousef | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
34 | GUO Woody | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
35 | JOHAR Manvik | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
36 | TAN Ryan | 12% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
37 | MANA Arnav | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
38 | KIM Teddy | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
39 | MAXU Tiger | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
40 | KIM Remington | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
41 | CHEN Maxwell | 49% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
42 | LI Ethan R. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
43 | WAGHOLIKAR Prathit | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
44 | JHA Manas | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
45 | ECKMAN Bjorn | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
45 | FORDER Jonathon | 27% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.