City Beach Fremont - Fremont, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% | |
2 | WATT Darren | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% | |
3 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% | |
3 | ZHANG Alec | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
5 | PARK Elliot | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
6 | ULINICH Alexander | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% | |
7 | LIU Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
8 | LEE Bryson | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
9 | KIM Sullivan | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
10 | KNUDSEN Travis | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
11 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
12 | ZHUANG William | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
13 | HE Zhiheng | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
14 | SEO Shawn | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
15 | SARKAR Anish | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
16 | QUITORIANO Matthew | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
17 | SARKAR agniv | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
18 | LEE Chun Po | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
19 | CASTELLY Luke | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
20 | PRAKASH Hari | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
21 | FERRIERE Joshua | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
22 | YU Austin | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
23 | LIU Noah | 8% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
24 | KUO Rylan | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
25 | PAK Elliot | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
26 | ARMITAGE Liam | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
27 | CHEN Bailey | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
28 | YUEN Nathan | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
29 | CHOI Zachary | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
30 | ZHANG Nathan | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
31 | GOLDBERG Artie M. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
32 | PEÑA Ethan | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
33 | NUGENT Jack | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
34 | ANDERSON Kai | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
35 | TONG Samuel | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
36 | MENDOZA Zander | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
37 | HSU Alexander | 13% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
38 | HOGE William P. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
39 | LIANG Eric | 50% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
40 | BHARGAV Angad | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | |
40 | HIGGINS Calvin | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
42 | SINHA Zaan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
43 | SIM Ian | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
44 | LAU Christian | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.