Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | |
| 2 | WEI HUNTER | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 3 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% | 4% | |
| 3 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 5 | MATEI Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 6 | SHEN Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 23% | |
| 7 | YU Hunter | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | 2% | |
| 8 | QUINLAN Sean | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 9 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 10 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 11 | LANGTON Sawyer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 12 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 13 | VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 14 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
| 15 | FENG Du | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 18 | CHOI Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 19 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 16% | |
| 19 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | |
| 21 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 22 | WENGER Caleb | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 23 | FU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 24 | MARSHALL William L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 25 | MORTIMER Gavin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | GUI Runlin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
| 27 | ZHANG William | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 28 | JANKOWICH Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 29 | MARINI Davide | 100% | 97% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 32 | WADE Grayson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
| 33 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 34 | JOSLIN Tyler | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 35 | EANG Brynner | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 10% | |
| 37 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 39 | MACNEILL Owen | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | BADEA Christian | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | THOMPSON Ian | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | CHALLAGULLA Manu | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 43 | STEIN Philip | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | HU Jansen T. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 45 | ZOU Xianyang | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | MASSE Jack | 100% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 48 | WANG Justin | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 85% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | JACKSON Nicholas | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | DANG Timmy | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 52 | BENCZE Kristof | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | GRAYSON Joshua | 100% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CHU Wenxi | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | MELCHER Charles | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 57 | DONG Bryan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 58 | PETERSEN Zachary | 100% | 71% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 60 | ROSENBLUM Addison J. | 100% | 55% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 61 | PONTIN Alonzo | 100% | 82% | 36% | 6% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.