Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
2 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
3 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% | |
3 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
5 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
6 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% |
7 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
8 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% | |
9 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | 46% | 7% | |
10 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
11 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% | |
12 | BERK Theodore | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 8% |
13 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 4% | - | |
14 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 18% | |
15 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | 3% |
16 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
17 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 49% |
18 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
19 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
20 | ORR Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | 12% |
21 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 96% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
22 | DEGROOT Blake | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
24 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% | 9% |
25 | LOVIN Vlad | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
26 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 93% | 49% | 11% | 1% | |
27 | WOO Christian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
28 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | 5% | - |
29 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 25% | |
30 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 37% | 5% | |
31 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 6% | - |
32 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - | |
33 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | 3% |
34 | BURBERRY Alan | 100% | 98% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
35 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
36 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 3% |
37 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 100% | 95% | 64% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
38 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
39 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 7% | - | |
40 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | - | |
41 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
42 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - | |
43 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
44 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
45 | SMITH Cooper | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | TANG Albert | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
47 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
48 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
49 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
50 | POLONSKI Anthony | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
51 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
52 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
53 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
54 | CAZER Mosby | 100% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | |
55 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
56 | FECHTNER Ezra M. | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
57 | WANG Mason | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
58 | LAI Twayne | 100% | 94% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
59 | RAJPAL Alastair | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
60 | LIU Jacob B. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
62 | GRINDEM Stuart | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
63 | IVANENKO Alex | 100% | 78% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
64 | KWON Andrew | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
65 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.