Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Seungwon | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 2 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D V V D V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 3 | KOKENGE Reid | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | DODIN David | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 5 | NGUYEN Tate | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | SONN Rohan | V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 7 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | KHANNA Nikhil | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | LOISEAU Eliott | V V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 10 | COUSINS Cameron | V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 11 | LAZARRE Alex | V V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | ZHENG Andy | V V D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | CHIN Dylan A. | V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 14 | PRABHAKAR Agasthya | V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 15 | WALIGORA Krystian | V D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 16 | KARAM Mateo | V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 18 | WALIGORA Sebastian | V D V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | ZHAI Avalo | D V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 20 | ZHENG Jerry | V V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 21 | DAO Alexander | D V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 22 | GINZBURG Adam | D D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 23 | WOLFE Alex | D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 24 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 25 | RICHARDS Colin W. | V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | SAUNIER Cameron | D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 27 | SHA Michael | D D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | SILVERS Ari | D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 29 | DHAL Leon | V V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | KRZYSIAK David F. | V D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 31 | SPINA Joseph B. | V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | KIM Brandon | D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 33 | LEWIS Jonathan | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 34 | MITEV Alexander | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 35 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | D D D D V D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 36 | CHADDERTON William | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 37 | FRANGER Max | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 38 | COPEN Elliot P. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.