Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
2 | YAO Bradley | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
3 | LING Eddie | - | - | 4% | 25% | 49% | 21% | |
3 | NGUYEN martin | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
5 | WONG Jackson | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
6 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
7 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
8 | CHENG Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% | |
9 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
10 | QIAN Jason H. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
11 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
12 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
13 | LEE Brendan | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
14 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 47% | |
15 | LIU Derek | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
16 | LO Preston | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
17 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
18 | SUAREZ Adrian | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 17% | |
19 | YI William | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
20 | GULCHIN Mark | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
21 | FEDELI Francesco | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
22 | ZHAO Adam | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
23 | LI Aaron | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 22% | |
23 | YU Jason | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
25 | ZHAO Nathan | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 16% | |
26 | GHEDINI Luca | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 16% |
27 | MAO Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
28 | MORROW Brenden | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
29 | RAJ Jay | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
30 | TANG Terry | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 31% | 2% |
31 | LI Bradley | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
32 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
33 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% | |
34 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
35 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 16% |
36 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
37 | KOE Beckett | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
38 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
39 | DOELL Ethan | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
40 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
41 | KIAYIAS Aris | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 34% | 8% | |
42 | CHINO CONSTANTIN | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
43 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
44 | MARTIN Darius | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
45 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
46 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
46 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
48 | YANG Charles | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
49 | CHEN Ethan | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
50 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
51 | HOU Gaven | 1% | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
52 | TAN Aidan | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
53 | SION Andrew | 1% | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
54 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER thomas | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
55 | DESERANNO Leander | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
56 | LIU ERIC | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
57 | GERRISH William | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
58 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
59 | LEE Christopher T. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
60 | TANG Alexander L. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
61 | PARRISH Evan | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
62 | MO Ethan | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
63 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
64 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
65 | WONG Jacob W. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
66 | CHO Xzander | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
67 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
68 | SUI Samuel | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
69 | BORG Matthew | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
70 | JIN Andy | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | |
71 | ZENG Rick | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
72 | PARK Rion | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
73 | ADAN Jacobo | 6% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
74 | VADEN Oliver | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
75 | LEE Charles T | 3% | 16% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
76 | DE LAUZON AUGUSTIN | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
77 | ZHANG Alex | - | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
78 | WONG Evan | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
79 | LU Kevin | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
80 | CHUANG Oscar | 1% | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 1% | |
81 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
82 | CHANG Jeremy | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
83 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 17% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
84 | SIMMES Jackson | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
85 | SHANNON Jack | 27% | 51% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
86 | ZHANG Lucas | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
87 | PARK Sangmin (Steve) | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
88 | FUKUDA Brando | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
89 | FOGELSON Hugh | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
89 | TOOMRE Kai | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
91 | ZHAO Ryan | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
92 | CHENG Logan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
93 | DERRICK Blake | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
94 | ZHANG Max | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
95 | HUA Aaron | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
96 | CHUN Dashel | 14% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
97 | LU Alex | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
98 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
99 | TANG Royce | 1% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
99 | ZHANG Graham | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
101 | NGAI Julian | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
102 | PAN Edwin | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
102 | LE Jacob H. | 2% | 16% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
102 | SHENG Dalton | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
105 | SUAREZ David | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
106 | MORROW Sean | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
107 | HE Kyle | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
108 | WEI JR Shan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
109 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
110 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
111 | WANDJI Noah | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
112 | DHOKTE Neev | 1% | 9% | 39% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
113 | BIELER Mason | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
114 | LU Nathan | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
115 | MARISI Gabriel | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
116 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
117 | PETROV Mikhail | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
118 | XIE Jicheng | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
119 | PARK William | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
120 | QIAN Zekai | 11% | 44% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
121 | MARTIRE Luca | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
122 | WU Thomas | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
123 | YU William | 21% | 49% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
124 | HONG Logan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
124 | YU Rainger | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
126 | HUANG Jinyao | 12% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
127 | POPOKH Luca | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
128 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
129 | SUNDSTROM Wren | 45% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
130 | ZHOU Alex | 11% | 60% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
131 | HE Ryan | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
132 | SHAW Spencer | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
133 | ZMUDA Aiden | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
134 | MOREA Anderson | 11% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
134 | ZHENG Marcus | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
136 | SISINNI Leonardo | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
137 | KRZYWON Dylan | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
138 | NOLAN Tyler | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
139 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% | - | |
140 | XU Nathan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.