Fortune Fencing Summer RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men's Foil

Saturday, August 27, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) - - 3% 20% 45% 32%
2 LUH Ethan K. - - - 2% 12% 40% 47%
3 WOO Christian - - - 2% 14% 42% 43%
3 KRYLTSOV Michael - - 1% 10% 33% 41% 15%
5 CANLAS Nathan - - - 3% 17% 44% 37%
6 JAIN Aditya - - - - 5% 31% 64%
7 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. - - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
8 MORROW Brenden - - 4% 20% 41% 29% 6%
9 CO Dylan - - 1% 6% 25% 44% 24%
9 SIU Aiden - - - - 5% 30% 65%
11 DETERING Julian - - - 2% 15% 42% 40%
12 HOSKERI Anik S. - 2% 13% 33% 37% 14%
13 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - - - 3% 17% 44% 37%
14 KIM Minhyeok - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 23%
15 SMITH Grant D. - 2% 13% 36% 37% 12% 1%
16 KIM Ryan Y. - - 6% 27% 45% 22%
17 ZHANG Yun Isaac - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
18 NAVARRO Kato 6% 32% 39% 19% 4% -
19 OH Jaden - 2% 14% 32% 34% 16% 3%
20 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden - 1% 7% 26% 40% 22% 4%
21 PONS Diego 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
22 ZHANG Aaron - 1% 6% 22% 38% 27% 5%
23 YU Jason - 1% 6% 27% 41% 22% 4%
24 RASMUSSEN Sage - 1% 12% 37% 36% 12% 1%
25 LIU Zixian (Aaron) - 3% 16% 38% 33% 9% 1%
26 ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) - - 6% 27% 41% 22% 4%
27 SHEN Owen - 3% 16% 36% 34% 11%
28 LYNCH Owen C. - 3% 16% 39% 31% 9% 1%
29 WEI Qiancheng (Matt) - - 4% 17% 35% 33% 10%
30 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. - - 2% 13% 37% 41% 8%
31 MYERS Dean 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7%
32 PIESNER Zachary C. 1% 10% 31% 37% 18% 3%
33 WU Alber Y. - 3% 15% 32% 33% 14% 2%
34 BAEK David - 4% 20% 38% 30% 8%
35 DERRICK Blake 3% 16% 34% 31% 14% 2%
36 CHEN Justin K. 1% 9% 33% 39% 16% 2%
37 MA Andrew - 3% 16% 34% 34% 13%
38 GREENEBAUM Oliver 52% 37% 10% 1% < 1% -
39 TEH Ryan - 3% 17% 39% 31% 10% 1%
40 LO Preston - 2% 11% 28% 36% 20% 3%
40 MA Bryant - 3% 15% 33% 34% 13% 1%
42 SAH Steven 12% 41% 35% 11% 1% - -
43 FUKUDA Diego - 1% 4% 19% 39% 32% 5%
44 PARK Rion 5% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1% -
45 LI Avery Peihong - - 2% 16% 39% 35% 9%
46 WONG Evan 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
47 DINSAY Kristjan 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6%
48 YI William 3% 19% 38% 29% 10% 1%
49 BORG Matthew 5% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1% -
50 LAM Nicolas 1% 13% 34% 35% 15% 3% -
51 GOBBO Alexander - - 1% 10% 33% 41% 15%
52 RUBIN Max 1% 15% 36% 33% 12% 2% -
52 EDISON Ansel 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
54 WANG Ethan - 5% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
55 KIM Daniel Y. 3% 16% 34% 31% 14% 3% -
56 LE Jacob W. - 1% 8% 28% 42% 22%
57 PINCHENG Yao 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2%
58 PARK Steve (Sangmin) 22% 48% 25% 5% - -
59 ATTIA Aly - 4% 17% 33% 32% 13% 1%
60 LI Jett 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 8% 1%
61 PARK Sky - 1% 8% 27% 39% 21% 4%
62 LE Jacob H. 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% -
63 ZHOU Oscar J. - 1% 8% 28% 41% 22%
64 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 22% 44% 28% 6% 1% - -
65 LLIDO Soren - 3% 16% 35% 32% 12% 2%
66 UHLIG Cole 8% 28% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
67 TUAN Evan 6% 30% 38% 20% 5% -
68 LI Matthew 1% 11% 36% 37% 13% 2%
69 WU Lucas 1% 12% 32% 36% 16% 3%
70 REICHEL Ezra 1% 13% 45% 32% 8% 1% -
71 LING Carson Jr 7% 29% 40% 20% 4% - -
72 TONKOVICH Ryan 10% 34% 35% 17% 4% - -
73 ZHAO Bowen 4% 19% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
74 CHOURASIA Ashirvad 20% 43% 29% 7% 1% - -
75 TULYAG Azim 11% 36% 35% 15% 3% - -
76 PARK David 29% 42% 22% 6% 1% - -
77 TSAY Jordan R. 4% 19% 36% 29% 10% 1% -
78 SIDDIQI Amman 63% 31% 6% - - - -
79 HE Bourne 52% 38% 9% 1% - - -
80 WILLEY Emerson 61% 35% 4% - - - -
81 MONTGOMERY Georgie 25% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
82 CHANG Nathan 21% 43% 28% 7% 1% - -
83 ZHAN Kevin 4% 26% 40% 24% 6% 1% -
83 YORK Lucas 22% 40% 28% 9% 1% - -
85 KHER Roan < 1% 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
86 CHUN Dashel 24% 44% 25% 5% - - -
87 NISHIHIRA Tyler 41% 44% 13% 2% - -
88 BUTLER Owen 16% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
89 DULAI Angad 12% 37% 37% 12% 2% - -
90 MAK Osman K. 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
91 GORDON William L. 50% 38% 10% 1% - -
92 FLANAGAN Miles 3% 25% 44% 23% 4% - -
93 PETROV Mikhail 19% 56% 22% 3% - - -
94 MORTON Joshua 7% 29% 36% 21% 6% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.