Orange County Convention Center - Hall WD1 - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
| 2 | GRASS Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
| 3 | CANO Marcos E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 5% |
| 3 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 5 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 9% |
| 6 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 9% |
| 7 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 8 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
| 9 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 6% |
| 10 | MOORE Jeremy S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 11 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 12 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
| 13 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 8% |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
| 15 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 16 | JITTAN daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 17 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 18 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | SAGE Michael P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
| 20 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 21 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 22 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 24 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 25 | ZHAO Bowen | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% | 1% |
| 27 | MONTALVO Mario Antonio | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 29 | JAUME Andrei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 30 | TANG Albert | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 31 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 96% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 33 | TRIPARI Jose G. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 35 | ROSS III Paul D. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 38 | FELIX Ian | 100% | 97% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | MCGINTY Eli G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 12% |
| 40 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 41 | BATRA Dev | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 42 | SWEENEY Noise Murphy Quinn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 44 | TANT Kenneth (Kenny) J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 45 | DAVIS Mitchell | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | YANG Ethan J. | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | LEWIS Jared | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | STORER Alex | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 51 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | 100% | 91% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | CHEN Zixuan | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | MYNATT Marcus | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | KIM Chaevin | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | SANCHEZ Carlos | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.