Arlington ESports Stadium - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SCHIEK Harrison | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
2 | LO Jake | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
3 | KARNAS Karol | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
3 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
5 | FU Leon | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% | |
6 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
7 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 21% |
8 | LI Samuel | - | - | 2% | 15% | 47% | 37% | |
9 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
10 | WOLFE Alex | - | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 27% | |
11 | KIM Nathan | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 36% |
12 | ROMANOV Ethan | - | 4% | 26% | 46% | 21% | 3% | |
13 | MAO Benjamin | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
14 | CHOI Zachary | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
15 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 12% |
16 | LIU Yikun | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
17 | CHIN Dylan A. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% | |
18 | XIONG Aaron | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 39% | 33% | 3% |
19 | LOISEAU Eliott | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
20 | HUANG Kenneth | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
21 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 13% |
21 | ZIEGLER John | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
23 | BARG Jonathan | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 35% | |
24 | YU Austin | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
25 | CORTRIGHT Caedmon | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 18% | |
26 | CHEN Bowen | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - |
27 | KUANG Bryan | 4% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
28 | TAI Edison | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
29 | YILMAZ Tarik | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
30 | VINOTH Aaron | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
31 | MIAO KUNQI | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
32 | BORISENKO Samuel | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | - |
33 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 1% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
34 | CARDENAS Lucas | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
35 | DONAHUE Lake | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
36 | LOISEAU Oscar | 1% | 7% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
37 | HUANG Yidong Allen | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
38 | WANG aaron | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
39 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
40 | MAXU Tiger | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
41 | RONG Gordon | 2% | 17% | 47% | 29% | 5% | - | |
42 | AYOTTE James | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
43 | MEHROTRA Neel | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
44 | LI zerong | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
45 | DADE MAXIMUS | 38% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
45 | SHEN Jiayi | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
47 | GRAMMATIKOV Michael | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
48 | RAO Neil | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
49 | OLSON Joseph | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
50 | COHEN Nathan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
51 | FALKIEWICZ Alec R. | 70% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
52 | TUMULA Arihaan | 26% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
52 | LOPEZ Aleksander | - | 5% | 27% | 44% | 21% | 3% | |
54 | KOLLARS Jacob | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
56 | LI Tristan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
57 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
58 | DECKER Hunter | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
59 | KIM Remington | 40% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
60 | SUNIL Rishab | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
61 | LEUNG Dylan | 8% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | WU Johnny y. | 27% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
63 | HERNDON Liam | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
64 | YANG Gary | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
65 | FENG Ethan | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
66 | JOHNSON Luke | 5% | 58% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.