Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LI Richard | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | KIM Tei D. | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | LEE Aidan | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | MARX Jackson L. | V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 5 | RUSADZE Nickolas | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | WU Alexander | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 7 | LI Yao (Liam) | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 8 | GU Andrew | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 9 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 10 | MIALL Steven A. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | JIANG Owen | V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 12 | LI Eric | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 13 | ZHEN Ethan | D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | WECHSLER Jacob | V D V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 16 | XU Andy P. | V D V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 17 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 18 | CHEN Kyle P. | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 19 | LIN James G. | V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | LIN Michael | D V V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 21 | GONG Benjamin | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 22 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 23 | CATINO Brennen | V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 24 | YU Jason | D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 25 | LI Matthew | V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 26 | LEE Christopher T. | V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 27 | CHENG Ethan | D V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 28 | TANG August L. | D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 29 | LEE Jacob J | D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 30 | TANG Alexander L. | V V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 31 | LI Jinghua E. | V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 32 | LEWIS Akhil | V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 33 | WONG Jackson | V D V V V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 34 | SONG Austin | V V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 35 | JURMAN Therin | V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 36 | LI Aaron | V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 37 | ZHANG Teddy | V V D D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 38 | ZHANG Alex | D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 39 | XIANG Derrick | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 40 | TANG Albert | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 41 | LIU Derek | D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 42 | LEE Jonah | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 43 | WANG Mason | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 44 | ZHANG Aaron | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 45 | SHAO Eric | V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 46 | LEE Brendan | D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 47 | LU Guanxun (James) | V D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 48 | HUTH Trevor | V V D D D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 49 | HUA Aiden | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 50 | LI Chenglang Ryan | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 51 | XU Ethan | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 52 | FANG Hanning | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 53 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 54 | GUO Justin | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 54 | SHEN Mingxuan | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 56 | SVERDLOV Seth | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 57 | WANG Julang | D V D D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 58 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 59 | TAN Aidan | V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 60 | HUANG Eythan | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 61 | JIA Jing Yu | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 62 | TANG Terry | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 63 | XU Dinghui Ryan | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 64 | ZHAO Adam | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 65 | LI Allen | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 66 | LIU Jeremiah | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 67 | ZHU Raymond | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 68 | LEE Eugene | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 69 | ONIK Ari N. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 70 | ZHOU Lyon | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 70 | JIANG Matthew | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 72 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.