Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 2 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
| 3 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 3 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 5 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 5 | WU Alexander | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 7 | LI Yao (Liam) | - | 3% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 5% |
| 8 | GU Andrew | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 42% | 7% |
| 9 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
| 10 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 11 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 12 | LI Eric | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 13 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 10% |
| 14 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 15 | WECHSLER Jacob | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | XU Andy P. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
| 17 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | - | 12% | 87% |
| 18 | CHEN Kyle P. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | LIN James G. | - | 2% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 6% |
| 20 | LIN Michael | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 21 | GONG Benjamin | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 22 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | CATINO Brennen | - | - | 6% | 27% | 47% | 20% |
| 24 | YU Jason | - | - | 3% | 29% | 62% | 6% |
| 25 | LI Matthew | - | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | LEE Christopher T. | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% |
| 27 | CHENG Ethan | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | TANG August L. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 12% |
| 29 | LEE Jacob J | 1% | 7% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 2% |
| 30 | TANG Alexander L. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 31 | LI Jinghua E. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 32 | LEWIS Akhil | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 33 | WONG Jackson | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SONG Austin | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 3% |
| 35 | JURMAN Therin | - | 3% | 22% | 57% | 17% | - |
| 36 | LI Aaron | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 38% | 8% |
| 37 | ZHANG Teddy | 16% | 44% | 32% | 7% | - | - |
| 38 | ZHANG Alex | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | XIANG Derrick | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 40 | TANG Albert | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | LIU Derek | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
| 42 | LEE Jonah | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 43 | WANG Mason | 2% | 22% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Aaron | 1% | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 45 | SHAO Eric | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 46 | LEE Brendan | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 47 | LU Guanxun (James) | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
| 48 | HUTH Trevor | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 49 | HUA Aiden | 3% | 19% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 50 | LI Chenglang Ryan | 15% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | XU Ethan | 5% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 52 | FANG Hanning | 2% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 54 | GUO Justin | 1% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | SHEN Mingxuan | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | SVERDLOV Seth | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | WANG Julang | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 21% | 55% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | TAN Aidan | 20% | 48% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 60 | HUANG Eythan | 13% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | JIA Jing Yu | 55% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 62 | TANG Terry | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 34% | 46% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | ZHAO Adam | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | LI Allen | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | LIU Jeremiah | 14% | 43% | 38% | 6% | - | - |
| 67 | ZHU Raymond | 9% | 42% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 68 | LEE Eugene | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 69 | ONIK Ari N. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 70 | ZHOU Lyon | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 70 | JIANG Matthew | 6% | 37% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 72 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.