City Beach Volleyball, Fremont - Fremont, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 45% | 18% |
| 2 | TAI Edison | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 3 | HSU Joshua | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | PARK Sangwook | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 5 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 6 | ZHOU Shawn | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 7 | GUO Woody | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 8 | VERON Darius | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
| 9 | WU Nathan | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 13% | |
| 10 | ENG Kyler | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 11 | LEUNG Dylan | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 12 | RYAN Pierce | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
| 13 | CLAES Thomas | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 14 | KIM Remington | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 15 | WANG Devin | 1% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 16 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 17 | BUROV Artem | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 18 | KIM Alexander | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | LOUIE Joseph | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | RAHMAN Ali | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 21 | RAHMAN Zayd | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 22 | TUBALTSEV Evan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 23 | MANA Arnav | - | 3% | 14% | 28% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 24 | YUAN Hanyi | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | WU Steven | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | SU Samuel | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 27 | YAO Tristan | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 28 | QUAN Leo | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | REICHMANN Theo | - | 2% | 11% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 6% |
| 30 | STREAM Logan | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | GACIOCH Noah | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 32 | BAUMAN Colin | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | BALUCAN Caelus | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | CHEN Aiden | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | WONG Kingston | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LIU Max | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 38 | JAMES Kaden | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | NARAYANUN Advay | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | DAI Jason | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 41 | FU Nolan | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | JAO Aaron | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 44 | SONG Joshua | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 44 | QIAO James | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MANA Sameer | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 47 | ROMAN Anton | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | WONG Aaron | 1% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | NICZEWICZ Charles | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 50 | GUO Luke | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | ZHU Owen | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | WONG Vansen | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 53 | MEDAMPALLI Pranesh | 1% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ARMSTRONG Hendry | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | KLINKNER Charlie | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | LUO Alvin Y. | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 57 | HONG Austin | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | ZHANG Luqi | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 59 | KAYA AlpDeniz | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 60 | LLANEZA Julian | 2% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | DAVIS Stewart | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.