City Beach Volleyball, Fremont - Fremont, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 18% |
2 | TAI Edison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
3 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
3 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
5 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
6 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
7 | GUO Woody | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
8 | VERON Darius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
9 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% | |
10 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
11 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
12 | RYAN Pierce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 4% |
13 | CLAES Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
14 | KIM Remington | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
15 | WANG Devin | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
16 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
17 | BUROV Artem | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
18 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
19 | LOUIE Joseph | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
20 | RAHMAN Ali | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
21 | RAHMAN Zayd | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | |
22 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
23 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 4% |
24 | YUAN Hanyi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
25 | WU Steven | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
26 | SU Samuel | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
27 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
28 | QUAN Leo | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
29 | REICHMANN Theo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 87% | 62% | 29% | 6% |
30 | STREAM Logan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
31 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | |
32 | BAUMAN Colin | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
33 | BALUCAN Caelus | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
34 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
35 | WONG Kingston | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
36 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
37 | LIU Max | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
38 | JAMES Kaden | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
39 | NARAYANUN Advay | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
40 | DAI Jason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
41 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
42 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
43 | JAO Aaron | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
44 | SONG Joshua | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
44 | QIAO James | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
46 | MANA Sameer | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
47 | ROMAN Anton | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
48 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 10% | 1% | |
49 | NICZEWICZ Charles | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
50 | GUO Luke | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
51 | ZHU Owen | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
52 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
53 | MEDAMPALLI Pranesh | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - |
54 | ARMSTRONG Hendry | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
55 | KLINKNER Charlie | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
56 | LUO Alvin Y. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
57 | HONG Austin | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
58 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
59 | KAYA AlpDeniz | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
60 | LLANEZA Julian | 100% | 98% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
61 | DAVIS Stewart | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.