Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OH Sean | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 2 | MOORE Jeremy S. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
| 3 | LANE Mitchell D. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% | |
| 3 | BRUCE Roman | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 48% | 13% |
| 5 | LEWIS Jared | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 6 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% |
| 7 | BELL Kenneth-John J. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 50% | 23% |
| 8 | CAMPBELL Justin | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 9 | BUTFILOSKI Cooper B. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 10 | HAZEL Susan L. | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 10 | TAI Serena | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | - | 24% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 13 | GOEBEL Alexander | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | FAN Yuchen | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | VERGARA Jaden Reese | 2% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 16 | CHAN Arden | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 17 | MILLETTE Brigid A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 45% | 1% |
| 18 | TAI Valerie | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | RILEY Owen | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 20 | NELSON Cole | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 21 | FROST Talon | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 22 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | LABAZIEWICZ Kevin | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 24 | DEMAREE Adam | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 3% | |
| 25 | MACK Jacob | 6% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | HUGHES Kayla | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | CONE James | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 3% |
| 28 | WOEHRMAN Madeline | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 29 | DAILEY John | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | CALL Mackenzie | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | BOWER Ian | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 32 | SHELTON Victoria | 2% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 33 | BRUCE Naomi | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | MOORE Melissa M. | 4% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 35 | FEIDLER Calvin | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | BOTKIN Elizabeth | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | GARRETT Nathan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 38 | FARRIS Niels | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | MURRAY Elijah | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 40 | RODDY Jackson | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | FERRARO Nicholas | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.