Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 2 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 3 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 3 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 5 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 6 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 48% | |
| 7 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 40% |
| 8 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
| 9 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 34% |
| 10 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 13% |
| 11 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 7% |
| 12 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 10% |
| 13 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
| 14 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 15 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 28% | |
| 16 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 18 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 19 | NICOLL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 25% | 2% |
| 20 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 24% | 2% |
| 21 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 21% | 2% |
| 22 | GERRISH William | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 23 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 1% |
| 24 | PAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 25 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% |
| 26 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 27 | TJON Calum | 100% | 100% | 97% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 28 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LI Bradley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 1% |
| 30 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 31 | GREENLEAF Paul | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LI Ayren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 33 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 31% | 3% |
| 34 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 35 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
| 36 | WANG Rory | 100% | 90% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | BLEIL Tyler | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | WANG Brian | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | CHENG Austyn | 100% | 68% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | LEUNG Jin | 100% | 98% | 79% | 35% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 42 | PEDERSEN Charles | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | 100% | 93% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | WUN Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 77% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 100% | 94% | 62% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 47 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 48 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | DALBERG Anders | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | BAI Brian | 100% | 78% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | NICOLL James | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 53 | TRAUB William | 100% | 83% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | YU Alan | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | TESSMAN Henry | 100% | 63% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | LORANGER Peter | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 57 | CANAPARI Charles | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MARSHALL Henry | 100% | 41% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | LAM Anthony | 100% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | LUTZ Max | 100% | 52% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | GROTH Caleb | 100% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.