Team Touche Fencing Center - San Diego, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | STEPHAN Jens | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | CHIEN Brandon | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | HIGGINS Branford | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 3 | LEE Chun Po | V V D V D | V V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 5 | MENDOZA Zachari | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 7 | MOSES Alexander | V D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 8 | MCDONALD Ethan | V V D D D | V V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 9 | SINGHA Orion | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | JAIN Aditya | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 11 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | FU Leon | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 13 | MACK Travis | D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 14 | MA Victor | D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 15 | CHAN Allison M. | D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 16 | VARGAS Susan M. | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 17 | HEWITT Frank F. | V V V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 18 | KIM Sterling S. | V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | CROSSMAN Brandon | V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | KIM Sullivan | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 21 | GOMEZ Christian A. | D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 22 | MIAO Kunqi | D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 23 | GOMEZ ISLAS Ezar Emiliano | D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 24 | PARK Augustine | D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | CHIEN William | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | MENDOZA Zoie | V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 27 | MENDOZA Zandro | D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | NEISINGH Isabelle | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 29 | LEE Youngin | D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 30 | RIDLEY Alan P. | D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | LIU Yikun | D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 32 | POUKKULA Adrian | D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 33 | WIESE Michael | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 34 | BACA Anthony | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 35 | EGENOLF Gabriella | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 36 | ROMANO Ren | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.