DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NORTH Gary S. | - | - | - | 11% | 47% | 42% | |
2 | MOORE Shomari A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 68% |
3 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 44% | 15% | |
3 | CAO Albert | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 6% | |
5 | DUAN Eric | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
6 | MAZUR Daniil | - | - | 1% | 16% | 51% | 32% | |
7 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
8 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
9 | LIN Harrison | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
10 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
11 | SO Lorenzo | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
12 | CHEN Brian | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
13 | KORSCHUN Daniel | - | 2% | 18% | 52% | 25% | 3% | |
14 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% | |
15 | WHEELER Daniel | - | 8% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
16 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
17 | LI Benjamin | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 6% |
18 | MURPHY Thomas P. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
19 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
20 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
21 | PALAMARCHUK Andriy | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
22 | USDIN Anton | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | - |
23 | WRIGHT Ezra B. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 15% |
24 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
25 | DOAN Joseph M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 51% | 13% |
26 | HULL Liam | 15% | 54% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
27 | LEE JoonWon | 1% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
28 | DIVERIS Joseph | 10% | 38% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | |
29 | LEE Aiden | 14% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
30 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | - | 3% | 22% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - |
31 | ILYAS Zakariya | 1% | 14% | 44% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | TIRADO Giancarlo | - | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
33 | CAO Brad | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
34 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 9% | 44% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
35 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
36 | BLACK Ethan | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
37 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
38 | ROBITZSKI David R. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
39 | BANNEN Nicholas | 26% | 48% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
40 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
41 | MEGGERS Samuel | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
42 | ACKLAND Matthew | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
43 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | - |
44 | MACE Eliza M. | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
45 | DAN Rex | 31% | 47% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
46 | MACTOUGH Ben | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.