Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | INSLER Gabriel C. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 2 | KANG Michael H. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | SPANO Gideon S. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 3 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 5 | HANXU Richard A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
| 6 | LEVY Jeffrey M. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 7 | GIBSON Nowell L. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 8 | ANDREEV Arthur | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 9 | HERGERT Benito | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 10 | KOKENGE Clark | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% |
| 11 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 12 | BEKKER Mitchel | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 13 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 14 | DISIMONE David Z. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
| 15 | SHENG Patrick Y. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 16 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | - | 3% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 18 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 19 | ELHADY Amr | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 20 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | KUMAR Anitya | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | MAAS Sean H. | - | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | WANG William M. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 24 | WU Jason | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | PLECHAVICIUS Daniel | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 26 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 27 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | LI Jeffrey | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | WANG Eric S | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 30 | ZHU Jasper | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | FAN Russell | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | LI Brian | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | GALIS Nicholas | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HE Lawrence | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 37 | BEYRICH Henry J. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | LIU Frank | 22% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | CHEN Austin | 5% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | BARSEMIAN Alexander | 14% | 46% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.