Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
2 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
3 | SPANO Gideon S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
3 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
5 | HANXU Richard A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% |
6 | LEVY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
7 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
8 | ANDREEV Arthur | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 17% |
9 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
10 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
11 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
12 | BEKKER Mitchel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
13 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
14 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
15 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
16 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
17 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
18 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
19 | ELHADY Amr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
20 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
21 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | MAAS Sean H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
23 | WANG William M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
24 | WU Jason | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
25 | PLECHAVICIUS Daniel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
26 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - |
27 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
28 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
29 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
30 | ZHU Jasper | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
31 | FAN Russell | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
32 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | LI Brian | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
34 | GALIS Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
35 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
36 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
37 | BEYRICH Henry J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
38 | LIU Frank | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
40 | CHEN Austin | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
41 | BARSEMIAN Alexander | 100% | 86% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.