ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | |
| 2 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 3 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
| 3 | KNOX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | |
| 5 | SUN Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 9% |
| 6 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 27% | |
| 7 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% |
| 8 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 9 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 10 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 4% | |
| 11 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 21% | |
| 12 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 13 | FENG Du | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 17% | |
| 15 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
| 16 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 17 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 18 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% | 1% | |
| 19 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 20 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 21 | JIANG ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 22 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 33% | ||
| 23 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 31% | ||
| 24 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 25 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 100% | 49% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | - | - |
| 26 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% |
| 27 | LAI Boden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% | |
| 29 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% | |
| 30 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 7% | - | |
| 31 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | OKUN Benjamin | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | ATKINS Levi H. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 34 | WANG zhixing (Daniel） | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 35 | POCHATKO Christian | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | TANG Charles | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | ||
| 38 | DUSSEAU Maddax | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 97% | 76% | 29% | 4% | ||
| 41 | MEN Junda | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | CASASSOVICI Georges | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 45 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 46 | MCWILLIAMS Miles | 100% | 90% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | KRAUSS Judah | 100% | 79% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 8% | 1% | |
| 49 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | SARIDAKIS Ioannis Thanos | 100% | 81% | 36% | 7% | - | - | |
| 52 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | RAFIQUE Faizan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | JONELEIT Aidan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 55 | WELIWATTA kenula | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | SIRICO John | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 66% | 18% | 2% | - | ||
| 58 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | RITTERSHAUS Bryce | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | SETO Jing | 100% | 89% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | GOON Tristan Yang | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | PEDICONE Joseph | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.