San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | FUKUDA Diego | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
3 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | CHOI Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
5 | MORROW Brenden | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
6 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
7 | LING Eddie | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
8 | NG Micah | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
9 | PORPORA Oliver | D V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
10 | WU Alber Y. | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
10 | LO Preston | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
12 | DERRICK Blake | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
13 | ZHU Raymond | D V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
14 | TSAY Jordan R. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | PARK Sangmin | V V D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
16 | TULYAG Azim | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
17 | RAJ Jay | V V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
18 | LI Richard | V V V V D D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
19 | DULAI Angad | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
20 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | V D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
21 | SHEN Oliver | D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
22 | CARVAJAL Josmar | V D D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
23 | RASMUSSEN Sage | D V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
24 | MANIKTALA Suvir | V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
25 | LI Jonathan | D V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
26 | YANG Charles | D D V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
27 | YUE Jackson | V D V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
28 | ZHANG Graham | D D V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
29 | HE Bourne | D D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
30 | FU Bryan | D V D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
31 | TALWALKAR Vedant | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
32 | DANIEL Nikith | D D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
33 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | V D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
34 | DURBIN DJ | D V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
35 | RUMPLER Donovan | D V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
36 | DULAI Agam | D D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
37 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | D D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
38 | ARCARA Evan | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
39 | GORDON William L. | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
40 | DE RIDDER Nathan | V D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
41 | SONG Matthew | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
42 | WONG Vansen | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
43 | BAUMAN Colin | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
44 | HE Ian | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
45 | LO Liam | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
46 | ANDRADE Cedric | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
47 | SHA Walter | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.