San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 2 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% |
| 3 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 3 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 5 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 6 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 7 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | |
| 8 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
| 9 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 10 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | |
| 10 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 12 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 13 | CHOI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 10% |
| 14 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 19% | |
| 17 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 18 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 19 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 20 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 39% |
| 21 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 4% |
| 22 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
| 22 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 45% | 8% |
| 24 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 12% |
| 25 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 5% | |
| 26 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 32% | |
| 27 | JI Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | 4% | |
| 28 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 35% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 30 | CHEN Wilson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% |
| 31 | WONG Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 32 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 33 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 37% | |
| 34 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 35 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 36 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 5% |
| 38 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 7% |
| 39 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 40 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 42 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 75% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 45 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | 2% |
| 46 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 47 | HE Bu Wei O. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 50 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 52 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 53 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 54 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 7% | |
| 57 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 58 | MA Bryant | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 60 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 61 | KIM Jackson | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 61 | KHER Roan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 63 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 64 | SEEDS Edward T. | 100% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 65 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 66 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 95% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 68 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 69 | WONG Matthew H. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 70 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 71 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 99% | 75% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 72 | WILT Daniel E. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 73 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 74 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 75 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 76 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 77 | CHASTAINE Ryan L. | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 77 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 79 | LI Jett | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 80 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 81 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 82 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 83 | OH Jaden | 100% | 99% | 81% | 37% | 6% | - | |
| 84 | QIU Tengjie | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
| 85 | LIN Richard | 100% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 86 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 87 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 88 | RANJITH Yash M. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 89 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 90 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 96% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 92 | LIU William | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 93 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 94 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 95 | SONG Jeremy | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | |
| 96 | LI Samuel | 100% | 89% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 96 | GERA Kaveer | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 98 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 99 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 100 | KIM Harrison | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 101 | BEAVER Aaron | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 102 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 103 | MIN Lucas | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 104 | COTHRAN Jack | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 104 | HSIAO Nicholas | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 107 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.