Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DELANEY Alexander D. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 2 | BEDOR William J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 3 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 3 | FAUBERT Andy C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 5 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 6 | JONES Simon A. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 6 | HILLYER Rourke W. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 8 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 9 | KOKENGE Clark | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 10 | COHEN Jared E. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 11 | SUPONYA Sergey | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 12 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 13 | KOLKER Gregory A. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 14 | BHATNAGAR Nishay V. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 15 | LUKANYUK Lorence | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | SPANO Gideon S. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | SHENG Patrick Y. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
| 18 | GANA Jorge A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 19 | KIM William M. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 20 | PERSAUD Daivik | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | MUNROE Shane | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 24 | MCDERMOTT Brian | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 14% |
| 25 | HANXU Richard A. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 26 | MRAK Michael R. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | KUMAR Anitya | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 28 | KANG Michael H. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% | |
| 29 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | SWERZENSKI Daniel J. | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHAWLA Armaan | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | PEDERSEN Christopher C. | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 34 | LIU Jack | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ROMERO Javier | - | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 37% | 11% |
| 36 | DOAN Joseph M. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 37 | MERCHANT Reza H. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 13% | |
| 38 | JIN Owen | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | WU Joseph | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 40 | HE Lawrence | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 42 | LIBERT Brian | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 43 | GANA Thomas A. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 44 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 45 | YOSHIDA Stephen R. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | NABAVI Matthew R. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 47 | HILLSTROM Nathan | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | BASOK Nikita | 15% | 34% | 31% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CLARK Ethan J. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | MACKIN Samuel | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 51 | MOYSE Alexander S. | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | AYALA Jaime | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 53 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | LIBSON Tazman | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 55 | BONIN Jr. Christopher J. | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | LI Jeffrey | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | CHEN Austin | 5% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | PARK Frederick | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | BURKE Cyril | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 60 | ALVANEZ Franki | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | LIU Frank | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | AGAON Shawn | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 63 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 64 | AGAON Ethan | 7% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 65 | WANG Eric S | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | TRAN Travis | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | GAO Daniel | 74% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.