Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DELANEY Alexander D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
2 | BEDOR William J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
3 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
3 | FAUBERT Andy C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
5 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
6 | JONES Simon A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
6 | HILLYER Rourke W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
8 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 9% |
9 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
10 | COHEN Jared E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
11 | SUPONYA Sergey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 9% |
12 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | |
13 | KOLKER Gregory A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
14 | BHATNAGAR Nishay V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
15 | LUKANYUK Lorence | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 2% |
16 | SPANO Gideon S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
17 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
18 | GANA Jorge A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
19 | KIM William M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
20 | PERSAUD Daivik | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
21 | MUNROE Shane | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
22 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
23 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
24 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
25 | HANXU Richard A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
26 | MRAK Michael R. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | |
27 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 12% | |
28 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 10% | |
29 | HEKMAT Sina R. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | |
30 | SWERZENSKI Daniel J. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - |
32 | PEDERSEN Christopher C. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
33 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
34 | LIU Jack | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
35 | ROMERO Javier | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% |
36 | DOAN Joseph M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
37 | MERCHANT Reza H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 13% | |
38 | JIN Owen | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
39 | WU Joseph | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
40 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
41 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
42 | LIBERT Brian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
43 | GANA Thomas A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
44 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
45 | YOSHIDA Stephen R. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
46 | NABAVI Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
47 | HILLSTROM Nathan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
48 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - |
49 | CLARK Ethan J. | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
50 | MACKIN Samuel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
51 | MOYSE Alexander S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
52 | AYALA Jaime | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
53 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
54 | LIBSON Tazman | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
55 | BONIN Jr. Christopher J. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
56 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
56 | CHEN Austin | 100% | 95% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
58 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
59 | BURKE Cyril | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
60 | ALVANEZ Franki | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
61 | LIU Frank | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
62 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
63 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
64 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 93% | 60% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
65 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
65 | TRAN Travis | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
67 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.