The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Goldfinch ROC D1A, Vet, RJCC and chair fencing

Div I-A Men's Foil

Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 8:00 AM

SportsPlex At Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HASSAN Mohamed H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 88%
2 KAO Castor T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 68%
3 BAE Kevin 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 18%
3 DESANDO Michael R. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 25%
5 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 23% 2%
6 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 68%
7 WU Nicholas 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 21%
8 LOCKWOOD Owen 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 13%
9 DAI Jonathan T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 45%
10 SHAFAIE Ali 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 27%
11 BING Charles 100% 100% 100% 92% 63% 19%
12 LI Eric 100% 100% 97% 79% 41% 9%
12 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 100% 100% 91% 52% 14% 1%
14 SAGE Michael P. 100% 100% 94% 74% 39% 11% 1%
15 JIANG Owen 100% 100% 97% 79% 43% 11%
16 JUDD Mehta J. 100% 100% 95% 72% 32% 7% -
17 HAN Changhee 100% 100% 97% 83% 48% 14% 1%
18 LIN James G. 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 35% 7%
19 LINALDI Alberto 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 16%
20 HERGERT Benito 100% 98% 84% 50% 17% 2%
21 SEZER Kaya 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 12%
22 KITAGAWA Eric S. 100% 99% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1%
23 LAUN Drew P. 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 32% 6%
24 BELLUOMO David C. 100% 100% 98% 81% 40% 8%
25 GAO William 100% 99% 91% 59% 21% 3%
26 AHN Jun 100% 100% 99% 86% 50% 13%
27 HSIUNG Richie 100% 100% 93% 67% 30% 6%
28 DAUM Charlie 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 3%
29 TRAUGOT Owen G. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 41% 9%
30 WANG Winston 100% 100% 97% 77% 37% 7% -
31 TAN Christien 100% 100% 100% 94% 68% 29% 5%
32 TANG August L. 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 7% 1%
33 FOGELSON Frederick J. 100% 100% 100% 93% 66% 23%
34 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 50% 14%
35 DOBBINS Evan W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 20%
36 PO Oliver 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 18% 1%
37 COSTELLO Chaissen F. 100% 100% 99% 86% 50% 13%
38 COZINE Owen N. 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 32% 6%
39 KEE Andrew L. 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 32% 4%
40 MIALL Steven A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19%
41 YOON DYLAN 100% 100% 94% 65% 25% 4% -
42 SONG Noel 100% 99% 91% 60% 23% 4% -
43 GAO Payton 100% 22% 2% < 1% - -
44 JI Aidan Y. 100% 95% 69% 32% 8% 1%
45 SONG Bryan 100% 99% 83% 48% 15% 2%
46 JOSEPH Willem 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
47 LIGOS Alex M. 100% 98% 83% 47% 14% 2% -
48 TAHOUN Mostafa 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 21% 2%
49 HE Xiangrui 100% 100% 100% 94% 73% 35% 6%
50 LEE Jonah 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 17% 1%
51 TRUBETSKI David 100% 98% 79% 32% 6% 1% -
52 MILLER Jordan 100% 92% 63% 25% 5% - -
53 BADLANI Dev 100% 100% 96% 64% 24% 4% -
54 PYO Michael M. 100% 100% 98% 82% 45% 11%
55 ZOBEL Eric H. 100% 100% 100% 95% 71% 26%
56 TEMPLE Jackson 100% 99% 92% 67% 30% 6%
57 ELWOOD Sebastian F. 100% 100% 99% 88% 53% 18% 2%
58 CHENG Nathan 100% 100% 100% 94% 67% 25% 1%
59 WANG Rory 100% 80% 36% 8% 1% - -
60 TANG Albert 100% 100% 96% 76% 40% 11% 1%
61 CHENG Jonathan 100% 99% 87% 55% 20% 3%
62 ROSE Ben 100% 99% 87% 48% 13% 1%
63 LEVY Jacob 100% 75% 28% 5% - -
64 WANG Brian 100% 61% 16% 2% - -
65 LIU Ryan 100% 82% 37% 9% 1% - -
66 POPE Alexander 100% 84% 43% 10% 1% - -
67 MCLAUGHLIN Ryan 100% 78% 35% 8% 1% - -
68 LEE Eugene 100% 46% 8% 1% - -
69 ARANA Massimo 100% 74% 19% 2% - -
70 TORRES Treston 100% 83% 33% 6% 1% -
71 YU Stephen 100% 88% 31% 5% - - -
72 WANG Michael 100% 97% 79% 43% 12% 1% -
73 AMRANI David 100% 72% 30% 7% 1% - -
74 TAM Kyle 100% 19% - - - - -
74 MUNDAHL Brandon D. 100% 97% 78% 42% 12% 1% -
76 LAO Kevin 100% 58% 13% 1% - - -
77 SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad 100% 53% 13% 1% - - -
78 LU Howen 100% 89% 54% 17% 2% - -
79 YULDASHEV Timur 100% 57% 17% 3% - -
80 ZUKOFSKY Zachary 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% - -
81 TANG xianchi 100% 47% 6% - - -
82 MUNDAHL Morgan K. 100% 88% 49% 15% 2% - -
83 HUNTER Phillip 100% 58% 15% 2% - - -
84 MURPHY Damian J. 100% 88% 20% 2% - - -
85 CHANG William 100% 72% 19% 2% - - -
86 RUPP Keegan E. 100% 27% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.