The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Fortune Fencing SYC/RJCC

Junior Men's Foil

Sunday, March 26, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
2 SISINNI Riccardo - - - - 5% 29% 66%
3 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - - - 5% 27% 45% 23%
3 SIU Aiden - - - 1% 8% 36% 55%
5 JAIN Aditya - - - 1% 11% 41% 47%
6 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - - - 5% 30% 65%
7 CORTRIGHT Skipper - - 4% 18% 38% 34% 6%
8 MORROW Brenden - 1% 10% 32% 40% 18%
9 SUNG Chang-Han S. - - - 1% 8% 36% 56%
10 MA Andrew - - 1% 11% 46% 35% 7%
11 CHEN Charlie Tian-You - - 1% 7% 31% 43% 19%
12 NGUYEN Martin - - 2% 14% 39% 37% 8%
13 PARK Rion - 5% 21% 36% 27% 8% 1%
14 OH Jaden - 2% 14% 34% 36% 13% 1%
15 GIRALDO Pablo E. - - - 4% 28% 49% 19%
16 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
17 WYMAN Julian - - - 2% 12% 39% 46%
17 RENTERIA Emiliano - - 3% 15% 36% 36% 10%
17 GOBBO Alexander - - 1% 10% 37% 42% 10%
20 WU Alber Y. - - 4% 19% 42% 30% 5%
21 KIM Andrew J. - - - 3% 16% 42% 40%
22 ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) - 5% 25% 40% 25% 5%
23 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. - 1% 9% 29% 38% 20% 3%
24 LI Toby 1% 14% 35% 33% 14% 2% -
25 FANG Jaden - 7% 45% 40% 7% - -
26 KIM Daniel Y. 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8% -
27 MUSHER Benjamin J. - - 3% 14% 37% 37% 9%
28 LI Samuel - 4% 22% 37% 27% 9% 1%
29 WONG Evan 1% 10% 33% 39% 15% 2% -
30 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. - 1% 10% 33% 40% 16%
31 KIM Derek A. - - 1% 10% 35% 39% 14%
32 WUJASTYK Leon - 4% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1%
33 LLIDO Soren - 2% 17% 39% 33% 9%
34 LUH Ethan K. - - - - 8% 37% 55%
35 VALOUEV Aleksey - - 1% 8% 33% 44% 14%
36 LIU William 1% 9% 25% 34% 24% 7% 1%
37 NGUYEN Liam - 1% 12% 34% 39% 14%
38 DINSAY Kristjan - 1% 6% 26% 43% 24%
39 YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. - - - 1% 11% 43% 46%
40 HUANG Jonathan - 1% 10% 29% 37% 20% 3%
41 FUKUDA Diego - - 5% 21% 38% 29% 6%
42 PONS Diego - 3% 14% 33% 34% 14% 2%
43 LAM Nicolas 2% 21% 40% 28% 8% 1% -
43 WONG Yuheng Isaac - 5% 24% 42% 24% 5% -
45 DERRICK Blake - - 2% 18% 44% 31% 5%
46 ZHANG Lucas 1% 15% 39% 34% 10% 1% -
47 LI Avery Peihong - 3% 16% 38% 33% 9%
48 ORNELAS Matteo 17% 58% 22% 3% - -
49 RASMUSSEN Sage - 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
49 ZHANG Jacob - 5% 26% 45% 21% 3% -
51 XIE Buster - 5% 36% 47% 12% 1% -
52 TUAN Evan - 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1%
53 KIM Aiden - 2% 17% 36% 32% 12% 1%
54 TALASILA Arush - 13% 37% 35% 13% 2%
55 MORTON Joshua - 29% 43% 23% 5% -
56 AGRAWAL Niki 6% 35% 40% 16% 3% -
57 PINCHENG Yao 4% 26% 42% 23% 5% -
58 FINNEY Lorenz - 1% 15% 38% 35% 11%
59 RYOU Andy - 3% 14% 30% 34% 17% 2%
60 AIKEN Nicholas A. 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3% -
61 PARK Sky 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% -
62 YORK Lucas 11% 42% 35% 10% 1% - -
63 NISHIHIRA Tyler 57% 35% 7% 1% - -
64 TULYAG Azim 2% 18% 40% 31% 9% 1% -
65 LING Eddie - - 6% 25% 43% 26%
66 BOUCHARD Kai 12% 34% 34% 16% 3% - -
67 DALVA Michael 11% 31% 34% 19% 5% 1% -
68 MA Bryant - 2% 20% 40% 30% 8%
69 BARTSCH Henry 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 2% -
70 REICHEL Ezra 3% 23% 44% 25% 5% - -
71 SAH Steven 2% 21% 42% 28% 6% 1% -
72 ROZALSKI Eli 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% -
73 FLANAGAN Miles 23% 45% 26% 6% - - -
74 TSAY Jordan R. 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
74 CHEN Brian 12% 33% 35% 16% 4% - -
76 ZHANG Graham 5% 39% 41% 13% 1% - -
77 GREENEBAUM Oliver 2% 26% 46% 22% 4% - -
78 ZHANG Aaron - < 1% 5% 24% 43% 24% 4%
79 BAE Eugene 7% 24% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
80 SEIGEL Duncan 31% 45% 20% 3% - - -
81 KUO Jayden 57% 36% 7% - - - -
82 LIANG Ethan 60% 37% 3% - - - -
83 GORDON William L. 3% 27% 42% 23% 4% - -
84 MONTGOMERY Georgie 25% 50% 21% 3% - - -
85 LI Gen 13% 44% 32% 10% 1% - -
86 KIM Jonah 9% 30% 36% 19% 5% - -
87 BOYNTON Alex 99% 1% - - - -
88 CHUN Dashel 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
89 PETROV Mikhail 74% 23% 3% - - - -
90 KAISER Lucas 27% 59% 13% 1% - - -
91 SHORTER David Alexander 68% 30% 3% - - -
92 ROSE Jacob W. 69% 27% 4% - - - -
92 STRUNK Jonathan 75% 23% 2% - - - -
94 DAYAL Vedant 47% 43% 9% 1% - - -
95 HE Bourne 60% 34% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.