Arlington ESports Stadium - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MUNLIN Donovan | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
2 | HURME Tommi K. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
3 | LEE Seungwon | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
3 | MAISONET-GUZMAN Hector E. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
5 | NEAL John P. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
6 | GYURE Brayden H. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
7 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | 3% | 14% | 37% | 40% | 6% |
8 | ELLISON Harper F. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 3% |
9 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
10 | RITCHIE Phillip | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
11 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 39% | 8% |
12 | FRENCH Timothy | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
13 | SNELL James E. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% | |
14 | YANG Zeph | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
15 | HENTOSH Pierce | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
16 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. | 1% | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
18 | EMMERT JP | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
19 | ROMANOV Ethan | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
20 | TIEMANN Landen | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
21 | GRAY Connor W. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
22 | CARDENAS Lucas | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
23 | DADE MAXIMUS | 28% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
24 | RIBAUDO David J. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
25 | VINOTH Aaron | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
26 | LESCURE Dimitri | 27% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
27 | ABBONDANZIO David R. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | - |
28 | STETSON Jahaan | 35% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
29 | O'NEILL Kevin S. | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
30 | ZAMORA Daniel | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
31 | MASK Austin | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
32 | CASTOR Landon | < 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
33 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
34 | SALEH Omar | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
35 | VUCINOVICH Brandon | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | KARIDIS-SCHNEIDER Samuel | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
37 | TALLEY Blake | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
38 | PARK Peter | - | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
39 | SPARKS Shaun | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | VRUBEL Eli | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
41 | VRUBEL Nathan | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.