Arlington ESports Stadium - Arlington, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
2 | HURME Tommi K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
3 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
3 | MAISONET-GUZMAN Hector E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
5 | NEAL John P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
6 | GYURE Brayden H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
7 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 6% |
8 | ELLISON Harper F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 3% |
9 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
10 | RITCHIE Phillip | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
11 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 8% |
12 | FRENCH Timothy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
13 | SNELL James E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 17% | |
14 | YANG Zeph | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
15 | HENTOSH Pierce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
16 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | 2% | |
17 | VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
18 | EMMERT JP | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
19 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
20 | TIEMANN Landen | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
21 | GRAY Connor W. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
22 | CARDENAS Lucas | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - |
23 | DADE MAXIMUS | 100% | 72% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
24 | RIBAUDO David J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
25 | VINOTH Aaron | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
26 | LESCURE Dimitri | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
27 | ABBONDANZIO David R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | - |
28 | STETSON Jahaan | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
29 | O'NEILL Kevin S. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
30 | ZAMORA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
31 | MASK Austin | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
32 | CASTOR Landon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
33 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
34 | SALEH Omar | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
35 | VUCINOVICH Brandon | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | KARIDIS-SCHNEIDER Samuel | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
37 | TALLEY Blake | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
38 | PARK Peter | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
39 | SPARKS Shaun | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
40 | VRUBEL Eli | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
41 | VRUBEL Nathan | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.