Athletico Center - Northbrook, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 2 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 5 | NOWAK Jakub P. | V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 6 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 7 | SILVERS Ari | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | ZIEGLER John | D D D D | V V V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 9 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 10 | KARNAS Karol | D D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 11 | RITCHIE Phillip | V D V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 12 | STENCEL Andrew E. | V V D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | D V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 14 | LEE Seungwon | D D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 15 | LIMER Avi | V V D D D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 16 | LE BIHAN Henri | D D D V D | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 17 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | V V V V V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 18 | SMITH Justin C. | V V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 19 | BEACH John | V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | KRZYSIAK David F. | V D V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | HU Anton | V D V V V | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 22 | DENNIS Ethan | V D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 23 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | MILLER Lance W. | V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 25 | REINER Julius J. | V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 26 | CONKLIN Jim | V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 27 | WHEELER Mark C. | D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 28 | CORRALES Victor M. | V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | CURTY Jack | D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | ELTERMAN Lev | D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 31 | ZHENG Jerry | D D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 32 | ALI Adam | V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 33 | SWANSON Dave | V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 33 | RAY William | V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 35 | BARNES William | D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 36 | FANG Hanning | V D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 37 | KRAJ Pawel | V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 38 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 39 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | D V D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 40 | RICHARDSON Ray | D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 41 | MCKEEVER Luca | D V D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 42 | CHU Duong | D D D V | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 43 | MITEV Alexander | D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 44 | AGARWAL Adheesh | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 45 | JOHNSON Jay | D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 46 | MADRY Josh | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 47 | YANG Pengfei | D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 48 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 49 | HE Lingyun Matthew | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 50 | LIN Zizhen | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 51 | VENTURELLA George | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 52 | CALLAHAN Zavier | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.