Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 53% |
| 2 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 3 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 3 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 5 | HOLMES Stuart S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 56% |
| 6 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 10% |
| 7 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
| 8 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 42% |
| 9 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% |
| 11 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
| 12 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 60% |
| 13 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 44% |
| 14 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 25% |
| 15 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
| 16 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% | 8% |
| 17 | ADLER David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 22% |
| 18 | HOOSHI JAYDEN C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
| 19 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 42% |
| 20 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 22% |
| 21 | HOOSHI DYLAN M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 27% |
| 22 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 23 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 16% | |
| 25 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 11% | |
| 26 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 44% | |
| 27 | WELCH Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% | |
| 28 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% |
| 29 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 2% |
| 30 | GUPTA Varun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | 6% | - |
| 31 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 2% |
| 32 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
| 33 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
| 34 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% |
| 35 | XIAO Bowen | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 36% | 5% |
| 38 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 9% |
| 39 | JACOVINO Jonathan S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | LI Ayren | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LIGH Thomas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 97% | 65% | 22% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 28% | |
| 44 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | 14% | 1% | |
| 45 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 29% | 4% | |
| 46 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 33% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 10% | 1% | |
| 48 | BARTRAM Carter H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 49 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | TEMPLE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 18% |
| 51 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | 1% |
| 52 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 53 | GAO William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% | |
| 54 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | 12% | 1% | |
| 55 | AMRANI David | 100% | 100% | 83% | 35% | 5% | - | - |
| 56 | CHREKY Jacob D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 56 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | 1% |
| 59 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 96% | 45% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 60 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 94% | 58% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | FENG Michael | 100% | 75% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 62 | LUM-DEBONO Alex | 100% | 98% | 75% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 63 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 72% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 64 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 59% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 65 | MCQUIDE Elliot | 100% | 77% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 68 | CHUA Kirby | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 70 | BALDWIN Benjamin | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | CURTIS William K. | 100% | 99% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 1% | - |
| 73 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 68% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | LI Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 76 | WANG Rory | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 77 | GE Daniel | 100% | 63% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 78 | HO Jor Sam | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 79 | WOHLERS Casey | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | WOHLERS Trevor | 100% | 95% | 67% | 23% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | CUTLER Andrew | 100% | 99% | 83% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
| 83 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 8% | - |
| 84 | ARRISON Alexandrew C. | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | YEE Michael | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 86 | SHAMBARGER Graham | 100% | 71% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | WILSON Samuel S. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | BISHOP Henry | 100% | 57% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 100% | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 90 | TIBBETTS Justin | 100% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 91 | HORAK Peter C. | 100% | 68% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 92 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 63% | 13% | - | - | - | - |
| 93 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 94 | DENG Kenny | 100% | 70% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 95 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 52% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 96 | COFFIN Carleton | 100% | 64% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 97 | HARRIS Noah | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | HOWARD Fox | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 99 | BERETICH Brian | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 100 | ANDERSON Maxwell | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.