Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center - Miami, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | EMMER Chase T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
2 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% |
3 | LOUIE Timothy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% |
3 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 10% |
5 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% |
6 | GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
7 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
8 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
9 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | 2% |
10 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% |
11 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
12 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
13 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
14 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 15% |
15 | ZELJKOVIC Dusan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | 4% | |
16 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
17 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
18 | REALS Alden D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
19 | YU Vinni | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
19 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 10% |
21 | BOBROW Logan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | < 1% |
22 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
23 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
24 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | 16% | 1% |
26 | LEE Chris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
27 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 7% |
28 | ROBINSON Keegan B. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
29 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 21% |
30 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 4% |
31 | PAE Jonathan L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
32 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
33 | HORSLEY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 14% | |
34 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
35 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
36 | WEN George C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | 1% |
37 | PAE Brian L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 35% | 3% |
38 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
39 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
40 | MCCORD Clark | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
41 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 10% | |
42 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% | |
43 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 86% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
44 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
45 | KIM Edward J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
46 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
48 | SURINGA William J. | 100% | 91% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
49 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 19% | |
50 | OH Sean | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 7% | - | |
51 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
53 | FURST Matthew C. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
54 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
55 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
56 | CASTRO Gabriel D. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 3% |
57 | YAN Edward Tianshuo | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - |
58 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
59 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
60 | TAKLE Douglas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
61 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 20% | |
62 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
63 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 75% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
64 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
65 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 52% | 12% | 1% |
66 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
68 | LONG Connor M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
68 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
70 | MAK Jeff | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
71 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
73 | FOTENOS Noah T. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
74 | TRUBETSKI David | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
75 | ALONSOZANA Andrew G. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
76 | BROWN Cullen | 100% | 86% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
77 | SCHLOSSNAGLE Christopher | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
78 | SANDOVAL Connor | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
79 | KIM Alexander M. | 100% | 81% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
80 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
81 | GASIOROWSKI Devin G. | 100% | 90% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | |
81 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 66% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
83 | KAST Quinn J. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
83 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 91% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
86 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
87 | TAYLOR Andrew K. | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
87 | GAO William | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.