Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DU Eiry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 2 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 3 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 3 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 5 | DAVIS Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 6 | KELBLEY Newt J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 7 | LURYE Lina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 8 | SIU Hazel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 9 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 10 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 11 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 12 | MCBRYAN Teresa N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
| 13 | SHAKIR Inaaya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 14 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 15 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 16 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 17 | NICHOLS Amber | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 18 | SEUK Irene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 19 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | < 1% |
| 20 | LANE Leah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | HEINRICHS Aaliyah | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 23 | YOU Joyce | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 24 | MYRAH Vivienne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 25 | XU Celina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
| 26 | HILBY Olivia | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 27 | OPIELA Natalie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 28 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 29 | SAZONOVA Alexandra | 100% | 95% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | FERNLUND Helen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 31 | NAROTZKY Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% | |
| 32 | DUARTE-GARCIA Zoya A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 13% |
| 33 | LEWIS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 34 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 20% |
| 35 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 6% | |
| 36 | HAYDEN Molly | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | |
| 37 | PAN Angela | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | SIU Maple | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 3% |
| 39 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 40 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
| 41 | HOOPER Lucy | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 42 | MARTURANO Bridget H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 19% |
| 43 | LORES Alicia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | |
| 44 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
| 45 | JARUSHI Amnee | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 46 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 47 | KING Emily | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 48 | DRYSDALE Lita | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 49 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | CHEN Alicia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 52 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 53 | AGAON Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 54 | OLIVEIRA Giovanna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 55 | SAUCEDO Grecia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 56 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | KIM Emily | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 58 | YUMIACO Nylah | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | ZHUANG Lauren | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 60 | MAY Courtney | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | NOH Rachel | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 63 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | BARTON Isabelle | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 65 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 65 | RALSTON Katherine | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | LEVKOV Maita | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | < 1% | - | - |
| 68 | CHAN Allison M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 69 | PARKS Eliana | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 3% | |
| 70 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 71 | MIDYANY Viktoriya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 72 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 73 | GAUR Ishi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 5% |
| 74 | ZHAN Clare | 100% | 87% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
| 75 | BEAMS Alyona | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 75 | REYNOLDS Elly | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 78 | ELKHATEEB Fajr | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 79 | POON Desiree | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 80 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 81 | HASIM Eurietta | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 81 | LUCENA Giselle | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 83 | MOHAMED Faisa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
| 84 | COLELLA Lauren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 85 | QUINTANILLA Danielle A. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 86 | ARAYE Nasro | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
| 87 | UM KIM Hyun Hee Lorena | 100% | 74% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 88 | GARCIA Lucy | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 89 | THOMAS Meagan R. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 90 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 91 | FRANCIS Elena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 92 | HART Jenna | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 93 | GAVILANES Madyson | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 94 | JONES Veronica C. | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 95 | KNUDSEN Ayda Jane | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 96 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 97 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 10% |
| 98 | GULLY Wren | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 99 | TSUI Zoe | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 100 | GARIKIPATI Thansi | 100% | 99% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 101 | PYE Emily | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 102 | MANAUGH Calliope | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 103 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 104 | JAIN Prisha | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 105 | MANCELL Hope | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 106 | WHITLEY Alexis | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 107 | JORGENSEN Kjirsten | 100% | 99% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 108 | KURDI Dina | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | SACHAR Ruhi | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 110 | ANDREW Katerina (Tina) | 100% | 90% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 111 | TIBBETTS Lily | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 112 | RAY Jessica | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 113 | HOLLAND Daisy | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 114 | FAKTOR Emily | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 115 | HOLLAND Sarah | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 115 | MISRA Tara | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 117 | KUNIHIRO Ashley | 100% | 78% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 118 | LOFTIS Hunter | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 119 | WIMERT Dahlia | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 119 | ALVAREZ Martine | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 121 | MARTIN Audrey | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.