New Jersey Convention and Exposition Center - Edison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MANN JAKEROD | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
| 2 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 3 | ZHAI Avalo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 3 | WANG Evan Haoxuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 5 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 6 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 7 | ALABI Tobi | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 8 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
| 9 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% |
| 10 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 11 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% |
| 12 | VODOVOZOV Denis | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 14 | ARAVIND Athreya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 15 | LIU Adam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 17 | DUAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 18 | SONG Troy | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | LEIBOWITZ Ryan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 20 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
| 21 | LAPP Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 22 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 23 | ATKINS Levi H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | XIAO Hanzhi （Shawn） | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
| 25 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 26 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 27 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 30 | MEN Junda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 31 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 32 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | GOON Tristan Yang | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 34 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 35 | TATE William Isom | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | STELTENKAMP Neal | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | GANESAN Mathavan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | TANG Charles | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 40 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 43 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 83% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | KRALICEK Emmet | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 45 | YAO Andrew | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 47 | SCAPICCHIO Stephen | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 48 | SONG Changze | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 49 | TING Max | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | MA Wilson | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SOSNICK Samuel | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LIN Zizhen | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | HERTZOG Ben | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.