Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 36% |
| 2 | SIU Aiden | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 40% | 52% |
| 3 | KIM Brandon J. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 3 | LAO Scott E. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 5 | EMMER Chase T. | - | - | - | - | - | 5% | 95% |
| 6 | SONG Lawrence (Larry) | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
| 7 | XIAO Edward | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 8 | CO Dylan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 47% | 9% |
| 9 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 9 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% |
| 11 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | - |
| 12 | LEVY Jacob M. | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 13 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 45% | 29% | 1% |
| 14 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
| 15 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
| 16 | LAM Nicolas | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | PORRAS Cristian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% |
| 18 | NGUYEN Liam | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 24% | 2% |
| 19 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 50% | 20% |
| 20 | LI Matthew | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% |
| 21 | DERRICK Blake | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 22 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 23 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 43% | 13% |
| 24 | DEANS Donovan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
| 25 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 36% | 4% |
| 26 | PARK Sky | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LI Avery Peihong | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | NGUYEN Martin | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 2% | |
| 29 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 6% | |
| 30 | LIU William | 2% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Jacob | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 32 | KIM John J. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | - |
| 33 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 34 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 35 | WU Alber Y. | 3% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | EDISON Ansel | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 37 | LE Jacob W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 40% | 9% |
| 38 | SETLUR Bhrugu | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 39 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | WU Trevor | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 41 | KIM Jonah | 10% | 43% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | MEDVIDOVIC Pavle | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 43 | CHOI Ethan | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | SAITO Braden K. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | PARK Ryan | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 46 | SMITH Grant D. | 1% | 13% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 47 | PINCHENG Yao | - | 8% | 41% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 49 | RUBIN Max | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | FLANAGAN Miles | 46% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | QIU Zhaocheng | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | CHOI Ethan | 31% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | CHANG Nathan | 28% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | MONTANO-ANIVARRO Andres | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 55 | BORG Matthew | 11% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | MIETTINEN Pyry | 17% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | LI Richard | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | CAJERO Luis O. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 60 | PARK Brandon | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | DENG David | 13% | 48% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | FOY Grant | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | COLLIS Tristan M. | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | GILMARTIN Colin | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 66 | MORTON Joshua | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | PETROV Mikhail | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 68 | LEE Christopher | 72% | 27% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 69 | KENO Daniel | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.