DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NORTH Gary S. | - | - | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 17% |
| 2 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 3 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% | |
| 3 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 5 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 44% | 14% |
| 6 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
| 7 | PAN Colin | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 8 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 48% | 21% |
| 9 | CARTER Austin L. | 1% | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 10 | SO Lorenzo | - | 3% | 35% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 11 | HE Lawrence | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 12 | SU Caleb | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% | |
| 13 | SNYDER IV William B. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 54% | 17% | |
| 14 | WHEELER Daniel | - | - | 11% | 53% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 15 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 16 | CAO Brad | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 17 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | JORDAN Anton | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 20 | SAUNIER Cameron | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | SWENSON Keane J. | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | |
| 22 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% | |
| 23 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% | |
| 24 | CAO Albert | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 25 | DAN Rex | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | JAKEL Alysa C. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 28 | ZHANG Caden | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | ROBERT Oliver | 20% | 51% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | ZHANG Sen | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | CSAJBOK Attila | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | QIU Emily | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | CHENH Justin | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 10% | 40% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | LEE Aiden | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | YU Jason | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | SZIEDE Kieran | 43% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | MACTOUGH Ben | 66% | 32% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 23% | 59% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.